Household Words, No. 14, June 29, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household Words, No. 14, June 29, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
From the fashionable “west end” we have to travel to a suburban spot for
the third place in rank on the health-scale. It is the sub-district of
Hampstead. All who have been upon its breezy heath, with its elevation
three or four hundred feet above the river, and its open view of the
surrounding country, will readily understand why Hampstead should rank
high in salubrity—though its average of rental may be low, and though
more persons (as they do) live in each house than in the houses of
Bermondsey and Rotherhithe.
Fourth on the list comes Hackney, which has only thirteen persons to an
acre. This advantage will be seen more strongly, when we know that
Hampstead has but six, and Lewisham, but two; whilst East London has two
hundred and eighty, and Southwark, one hundred and sixty-five persons
per acre. Hackney also has water from the New River, a comparatively
pure source; and, though its houses are small, with a rental of but
35_l._, the number of occupants to each is but seven.
For the fifth in order of salubrity we have again to cross the Thames.
It is Camberwell. This parish lies very low, being only four feet above
the water mark; but, then, it is fringed on one side by the open
country; is sheltered from cold winds; is thinly peopled, having only
twelve persons to an acre, and only six occupants to a house. Its
drainage is, almost necessarily, bad, but its neighbourhood to the green
fields compensates for many sanitary evils.
Wandsworth, with a burden of poor rates almost equal in poundage to that
inflicted upon Southwark and Lambeth comes next. The recommendations of
Wandsworth are, a population of only four to an acre. This indication of
ample open spaces explains the general healthiness of the parish. Its
position and bad drainage have rendered it liable to very heavy loss
from epidemics. Cholera found a larger proportion of victims in
Wandsworth than in the densest peopled parish on the north of the river.
“Merry Islington” ranks only seventh in spite of its high and dry
position, and its New River water, and its neighbouring fields. Its
elevation is eighty-eight feet above the river; its density of
population, twenty-five to an acre; its average rental 35_l._; its
annual deaths, one in fifty.
Kensington and Chelsea follow next, and with them are included Brompton,
Hammersmith, and Fulham. They all lie low, but are in pleasant company
with fields and open spaces; their people are well to do in the world,
and a large portion drink good water.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account