It is, however, obvious that where a medium writes automatically or
speaks under control there must always exist a doubt as to how much
is genuine and how much is “sophistication,” either intentional or of
an unconscious character. The sitter, therefore, who thinks proper to
consult a professional medium will do well to ask for a Table-sitting
in preference to a Trance-sitting; as when a Table-sitting takes place
the medium remains normal, and the communication is conveyed through
the instrumentality of the inanimate table instead of making its way
amid the disturbing influences of the medium’s brain and personality.
If the medium cannot, or will not, give a Table-sitting it is not worth
while for the sitter to express any dissatisfaction: the situation must
be accepted with as good a grace as possible--tranquillity and harmony
being the proper atmosphere where mental phenomena are in issue.
In the case of Trance-sittings, where the medium is likely to be
strongly controlled and made to speak or act in the guise of some other
individuality (it being sometimes the case that a decided modification
of facial expression, features and voice becomes noticeable), a
frequent practice is to arrange for a subdued light--as, for example,
by pulling down the window-blinds and using a lamp with red glass. This
is quite unnecessary; it is a mere conventional usage based upon a
tradition to the effect that spirits are more powerful in darkness than
in light; but the proceeding need not be objected to. It is as harmless
as is the colour or the pattern of the wall-paper.
Some professional mediums adopt the method of Clairvoyance and
Clairaudience; that is to say, the communications take the form of an
oral description by the medium of what he or she sees and hears in the
vicinity of the sitters--the underlying supposition being that the
latter bring with them certain haunting spirits or that certain spirits
make their way into the room from the outside in order to be near the
sitters. This kind of a sitting is, perhaps, the least satisfactory of
any from an intellectual point of view. The medium may be labouring
under some delusion or may even be deliberately inventing the alleged
appearances and utterances. No method has yet been discovered of
clearly distinguishing between genuine and unreal clairvoyance (a word
which also includes crystal-gazing and the like). Sitters must judge
for themselves what to believe and what to reject.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account