How to Study ArchitectureCaffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
History
How to Study Architecture
Caffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
Architecture -- History
Darius I, fourth of the Achæmenian dynasty, founded Persepolis, about
forty miles northeast of the modern Shiraz, commenced building the
famous palace and constructed for himself a tomb. Xerxes I added a
palace and a tomb of his own, while tombs also were built by Artaxerxes
III and Darius II. But, while Persepolis remained the favourite resort
of the Persian Kings, it was too remote a spot to be the seat of
government, which continued to be divided between Babylon, Susa, and
Ecbatana.
Meanwhile, under Xerxes I the Persian power came into conflict with the
Hellenic and was worsted in the battles of Platæa and Thermopylæ and the
sea-fight at Salamis. Henceforth the advance of the Persian Empire was
checked; dissensions began to weaken it; the central authority relapsed
into feebleness, with lurid intervals of cruelty, until finally it
succumbed to the rising tide of Macedonian conquest. In 331 <small>B.C.</small>
Alexander the Great crushed the army of Darius III near Arbela; took in
turn the cities of Babylon, Susa, and Ecbatana and stripped them of
their treasure, finally capturing Persepolis, and setting fire to it.
This act of vandalism has been variously explained. One story, which
forms the subject of Dryden’s “Ode to Saint Cecilia’s Day,” had it that
the wanton act was instigated by the courtezan, Thais. Another story is
that it was an act of revenge for the destruction of Greek temples by
Xerxes I; while still another relates that in this destruction of the
very heart of Iran, Alexander wished to impress the Oriental imagination
with the absoluteness of his supremacy.
After being subject to the rule of the successors of Alexander and to
the domination of the later Parthian Empire, Persia once more became an
empire under the Sassanian Dynasty, Ctesiphon being one of its chief
cities. In the seventh century <small>A.D.</small> it was conquered by the Saracens and
entered into the Mohammedan civilisation, which we shall discuss in a
later chapter.
* * * * *
The rapid rise of the Persian power was due to the hardiness of this
mountain race and its highly organised preparation for war. Every
Persian able to bear arms was bound to serve the King: the great
landowners on horseback, the commonalty on foot. The army, therefore,
unlike those of the Oriental nations it encountered, was composed of
cavalry as well as infantry; and, while the latter, armed with bows,
kept the enemy at a distance and harassed them with storms of arrows,
the cavalry, operating on their flanks and rear, completed the rout. It
was only when the power had become unwieldy by its very vastness, that
this method of warfare proved useless against the Greek hoplites and the
massed formation of the Macedonian phalanx.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account