Note.--For a humanistic view of the field of education, the reader may be referred to an article by Irving Babbitt, “President Eliot and American Education,” in the _Forum_, January, 1929, or to his book on _Literature and the American College: Essays in Defence of the Humanities_ (Houghton Mifflin Co., 1908). See also Norman Foerster’s recent book, _The American Scholar: A Study in Litteræ Inhumaniores_ (University of North Carolina Press, 1929).--Editor. FOOTNOTES [2] For an outline of Chinese humanism, see the article by Chang Hsin-Hai in the _Hibbert Journal_ for April, 1928 (“The Essentials of Confucian Wisdom”). [3] See _The Conduct of Life_, translation of the _Tsung Yung_ by Ku Hung Ming (Wisdom of the East series), p. 55. [4] “Unum hoc animal sentit quid sit ordo, quid sit quod deceat, in factis dictisque qui modus.” _De Officiis_, Lib. I. [5] See _Analects_ (Wisdom of the East series), p. 109. [6] “Conclusion” to his volume _The Renaissance_. [7] For Pater’s definition of humanism see the end of his essay on Pico della Mirandola (_The Renaissance_). [8] See _L’Inde el le Monde_, pp. 32, 165. [9] See, for example, the symposium entitled _Humanist Sermons_ edited by C. W. Reese (1927). On page 60 of this volume one encounters the statement that “all Americans are humanists”! For a fuller elucidation of the distinction between the humanist and the humanitarian see the opening chapters of my book _Literature and the American College_ (1908). [10] See my book _Democracy and Leadership_, p. 25. [11] For the different meanings that this maxim may have see the last chapter of my book _The Masters of Modern French Criticism_. [12] See “The Mucker Pose” by James Truslow Adams, _Harper’s Magazine_, November, 1928; reprinted in _Our Business Civilisation_ (1929). [13] For the early hostility of certain Christians to Graeco-Roman culture and the final reconciliation between this culture and the Church, see E. K. Rand’s _Founders of the Middle Ages_, _passim_. _Cf._ also P. E. More’s “Paradox of Oxford” (_Shelburne Essays_, Vol. IX). [14] See Ch. V of _Democracy and Leadership_ (“Europe and Asia”); also Appendix A (“Theories of the Will”). [15] _The Ideas of the Fall and of Original Sin_ (Bampton Lectures for 1924). See p. 331. [16] “Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum.” [17] Confucianism is of course primarily humanistic. _The Humility of Common Sense_[18] PAUL ELMER MORE I