Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical surveyReich, Emil
History
Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical survey
Reich, Emil
Hungarian literature -- History and criticism
of Mohács (1526), written in dystichs, Kisfaludy is frequently more than
clever; in that ode he soars to the sublime. His “_Eprészleány_” (“Girl
Gleaning Strawberries”) is a charming idyll.
CHAPTER XXI.
The work of Kisfaludy was great. He charmed his readers, and thus
awakened an interest in Hungarian Literature in circles that had hitherto
been callous to the intellectual revival of their country. His vocation,
however, was limited. The Hungarians, by nature grave and given to
ponderous sentiments, needed, for a full awakening of their literary
life, more than the perfume of flowers. The rhythmic thunder of the
war-clarion; the majesty of the organ was needed. And the right man came.
The man, in whose sublime poems was heard the turmoil of the old glorious
wars, the symphony of love and patriotism, in tones of unprecedented
beauty. That man was Michael Vörösmarty (1800-1855). His life was devoted
entirely to the pursuit of literature, and in his soul there was only
one grand thought: to become Hungary’s troubadour, to kindle the holy
light of patriotism on the altar, and with the aid of the muses. In this
he was successful beyond all his predecessors. His were some of the
rarest qualities, the union of which goes to make the great poet. In
beauty and truly Magyar rhythm of language he was and largely still is
unsurpassed. His diction is, like his country, full of the majesty of
vast mountains, and the loveliness of flower-clad meadows sloping down to
melodious rivers. Without being a reckless innovator of words, his works
read at the first appearance as if written in a new language. As when
the student of Hellenic antiquity, after years spent with engravings of
old Greek art, comes for the first time to see one of the still extant
remains of that art itself: so felt the contemporaries of Vörösmarty
when the glorious hexameters of his epic, “_Zalán futása_” first struck
their ears. There was at last, not only this or that instrument of the
orchestra of Hungarian language; there was heard, not only the wails of
the ’cello of Kölcsey; the musical cascades of the clarinet of Charles
Kisfaludy; the wafting chords of the harp of Berzsenyi; or the gossamer
oboe of Csokonai: there was heard the unison and harmonious struggle
of all the instruments of the great idiom. Like the composers of the
immortal symphonies, Vörösmarty wielded the resources of the Magyar
language, intensifying the effect of each instrument by the parallel or
counter-quires of the other instruments. In his love-songs you hear
not only the notes of the melody, but also, as in the songs of his
Austrian contemporary, Schubert, the undercurrents of the melody in the
accompaniment. The wealth of poetic figures in Vörösmarty is surprising;
yet a chaste moderation tempers all undue exuberance. He is powerful,
not violent; imposing, not fierce. He writes mostly Largos; but there
are very few _longeurs_ in them. The quick pulsation of the drama does
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account