Iconoclasts: A Book of Dramatists: Ibsen, Strindberg, Becque, Hauptmann, Sudermann, Hervieu, Gorky, Duse and D'Annunzio, Maeterlinck and Bernard ShawHuneker, James
History
Iconoclasts: A Book of Dramatists: Ibsen, Strindberg, Becque, Hauptmann, Sudermann, Hervieu, Gorky, Duse and D'Annunzio, Maeterlinck and Bernard Shaw
Huneker, James
Dramatists; European drama -- 19th century -- History and criticism; European drama -- 20th century -- History and criticism
A period of depression, consequent upon his uninterrupted labours and
their seeming futility, may have been one reason; the other is probably
because Ibsen, charged with the spirit of bitter mockery and in a
pessimistic humour, wished to show the obverse of his medal. From Brand
to Stockmann his idealists had been heaven-stormers. Well, here is a
heaven-stormer, an idealist, who is a dangerous man _because_ he tells
the truth. Is it well to blurt out the truth on all occasions? The
result of this thesis is one of the most entertaining, one of the most
tragic, plays of the series.
The Wild Duck has several drawbacks, the chief being the confusing
mixture of satire and tragedy; the satire almost oversteps the
limitations of satire, the tragic emphasis seems to be placed at the
wrong spot. The two qualities mingle indifferently. And the act ends
are not satisfying; they lack climax, especially after the catastrophe.
But the dialogue as in The League of Youth is an admirable transcript
from life. Each character speaks; nothing sounds as if written. The
glory of The Wild Duck is its characterization. Even the implacable
Dr. Nordau praises Gina Ekdal, calling her a female Sancho Panza. The
comparison is a happy one, for her husband, Hjalmar Ekdal, is a Don
Quixote of shreds and patches, a weak, vain, boastful, gluttonous,
shiftless fellow, and, of course, an idealist. He raves of the ideal,
and he is kept to an insane pitch of cloudy self-exaltation by Gregers
Werle, who, discovering that Gina was a former mistress of his father,
tells Ekdal with dire results. The little Hedwig, the most touching in
Ibsen's gallery of children, is also worked upon by the mischief maker,
so that she kills herself from a spirit of sacrifice--more of Werle's
idealism.
Ekdal talks grandiloquently about shattered honour to Gina, who bids
him eat bread, drink coffee--he has been out all night airing his woes
to the storm. The woman's homely wit, solid common sense, and big
heart are given with satisfying verisimilitude. Gregers' father, and
his housekeeper, Mrs. Sörby; the garret of the photographer Ekdal,
where his disgraced, old drunken father has rigged up a mock forest
in which he hunts the "wild duck" and other tame fowl; the character
of Relling, Ibsen again masked, whose sardonic humour, cruel on the
surface, is in reality prompted by a kind heart--he makes people
believe they are grander than they are and therefore makes them
happier; all these figures in this amazing Vanity Fair are handled
masterfully. The World-Lie is here in microcosmic proportions. Every
one, except the stolid, unimaginative Gina, swaggers about in the
sordid atmosphere of deception. Werle always makes matters worse, and
on a painful note of tragedy the curtain falls. The tyranny of the
ideal is clearly set forth.
* * * * *
XI
ROSMERSHOLM
(1886)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account