“I am ordered by the High Court of Appeal to acquaint your lordship, in
order to your better preparing yourself for your trial, that a true bill
hath been sent down, and the indictment lieth against your lordship for
the murder of one Lewis Pyneweck of Shrewsbury, citizen, wrongfully
executed for the forgery of a bill of exchange, on the—the day of ——
last, by reason of the wilful perversion of the evidence, and the undue
pressure put upon the jury, together with the illegal admission of
evidence by your lordship, well knowing the same to be illegal, by all
which the promoter of the prosecution of the said indictment, before the
High Court of Appeal, hath lost his life.
“And the trial of the said indictment, I am farther ordered to acquaint
your lordship is fixed for the 10th day of —— next ensuing, by the
right honourable the Lord Chief-Justice Twofold, of the court aforesaid,
to wit, the High Court of Appeal, on which day it will most certainly
take place. And I am farther to acquaint your lordship, to prevent any
surprise or miscarriage, that your case stands first for the said day,
and that the said High Court of Appeal sits day and night, and never
rises; and herewith, by order of the said court, I furnish your lordship
with a copy (extract) of the record in this case, except of the
indictment, whereof, notwithstanding, the substance and effect is
supplied to your lordship in this Notice. And farther I am to inform
you, that in case the jury then to try your lordship should find you
guilty, the right honourable the Lord Chief-Justice will, in passing
sentence of death upon you, fix the day of execution for the 10th day of
——, being one calendar month from the day of your trial.”
It was signed by “CALEB SEARCHER,
“Officer of the Crown Solicitor in the
“Kingdom of Life and Death.”
The Judge glanced through the parchment.
“’Sblood! Do they think a man like me is to be bamboozled by their
buffoonery?”
The Judge’s coarse features were wrung into one of his sneers; but he
was pale. Possibly, after all, there was a conspiracy on foot. It was
queer. Did they mean to pistol him in his carriage? or did they only
aim at frightening him?
Judge Harbottle had more than enough of animal courage. He was not
afraid of highwaymen, and he had fought more than his share of duels,
being a foul-mouthed advocate while he held briefs at the bar. No one
questioned his fighting qualities. But with respect to this particular
case of Pyneweck, he lived in a house of glass. Was there not his
pretty, dark-eyed, over-dressed housekeeper, Mrs. Flora Carwell? Very
easy for people who knew Shrewsbury to identify Mrs. Pyneweck, if once
put upon the scent; and had he not stormed and worked hard in that case?
Had he not made it hard sailing for the prisoner? Did he not know very
well what the bar thought of it? It would be the worst scandal that ever
blasted judge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account