In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the SaharaPowell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
History
In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the Sahara
Powell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
Africa, North -- Description and travel
The Carthaginians, be it understood, never fought if they could help
it. Essentially a commercial-minded, luxury-loving people, they had no
lust for empire, save that of the sea, mastery of which insured them
control of the ports and markets which were necessary to their commercial
supremacy. But as the city grew in wealth, power, and population,
territorial expansion became imperative, and they pressed forward
gradually until they occupied, more or less completely, a territory
roughly corresponding to modern Tunisia plus the Algerian department of
Constantine. This gradual expansion of Carthage’s sphere of influence was
effected not so much by the sword, however, as by treaty with the warlike
native tribes, from which she recruited her armies of mercenaries. Even
in Carthage itself, whose inhabitants at one period numbered close to
three quarters of a million, but a small minority of the population was
of pure Phenician stock, the bulk of the people consisting of the native
Libyans with a sprinkling of half-castes, negro slaves, and traders of
all races. The Carthaginians might be said, indeed, to have occupied a
position somewhat analogous to that held by the French in the Tunisia of
to-day.
The government of Carthage was a pure oligarchy, in which none save the
old Punic families had any voice. All powers of government, legislative,
executive, and judicial, were vested in the Council of One Hundred,
whose decrees were carried out by officials known as “suffetes.” As
these offices were for sale, the oligarchy eventually degenerated into a
plutocracy, corrupt, vulgar, arrogant, and heartless, in which political
dominance was exercised by one or another of the great families, as was
the case in medieval Italy.
Save in the single field of agriculture, which they developed
scientifically and with remarkable success, the Carthaginians have to
their credit no achievements in science, literature, or art, even their
architecture showing the effect of Greek and Egyptian influence. As has
been said, they were first, last, and always traders, money-makers,
possessing to an exceptional degree that Semitic aptitude for business
and banking which has made the Jews the financiers of the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account