Detective and mystery stories; Wise, Pennington (Fictitious character) -- Fiction
“Real alibis are not always easy to prove. It’s your faked alibi that’s
glibly detailed and sworn to. There’s no one in my aunt’s household but
herself, myself, and Miss Gurney, her companion. We three were in our
beds and asleep at the time of the murder, but we can’t prove it by eye
witnesses! Naturally, there’s no one to swear to it, except ourselves.
Now, where does that lead you?”
“To further investigation. You know your aunt’s paper-cutter was
found——”
“That proves nothing. You must connect that knife undeniably with the
crime before you can use it against her.”
“I grant that. But first, let’s look into the motive. Your aunt did want
Sir Herbert out of the way. She did say she wished he was dead. She did
say she would kill him herself if she were sure she’d never be found
out.”
“I know she said those things, for I heard her,—not once, but
repeatedly. But my aunt is a quick-tempered and thoughtless-speaking
woman. She has time and again wished various people dead. She has often
expressed her willingness to kill certain people. But it meant no
more,—as she said it,—than for another to wish bad luck to them, or
say they hate them. She is most unguarded in her expressions and
exaggerates always. These things must be understood by you before you
accuse her. She has frequently wished herself dead, but she didn’t mean
it any more than she meant it regarding Sir Herbert.”
“All that will be considered and remembered, but we must question her.”
“You’d better question me. I can tell you anything she can, and in a
more satisfactory manner.”
“Tell us all you like,—all you will, but we must also question Miss
Prall and Miss Gurney.”
“All right, but there are other directions in which to look. Don’t be
too sure that women committed the deed.”
“No use your trying to throw over that dying statement. No use looking
for a man in the case, with that note before our eyes. You know yourself
if a man or men had killed Sir Herbert nothing could have influenced him
to write a denunciation of women. Why would he? What possible
circumstance could explain it? Have you any theory that would fit the
facts?”
“No, unless a man killed him at the instigation of or in behalf of some
women and Sir Herbert wanted the deed traced to its true source.”
“Even that doesn’t seem to make plausible a positive assertion that
‘women did this.’ No, there’s no getting away from that avowal. And, you
must see that the use of the plural,—women,—signifies collusion. Two
or more must be implicated. Not necessarily two or more present at the
moment of the crime, but two or more to be found and punished.”
“Yes, I see all that,—and I want to find the criminals as much as you
do. Especially now, since Miss Prall’s name has been dragged in. But I
do want you to understand how little her hints at ‘killing’ anybody
really mean. You know what an extravagant talker she is.”
“I do know that, and I assure you I’ll make all allowances. But I can’t
leave any stone unturned.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account