┌——────────——————┬————──────——┬———──────———┬——──────————–┐
│ │ In India. │ In London. │ Total. │
├————────────————┼—————──────—┼——──────————┼————──────——–┤
│ March 31, 1901 │ £8,767,687 │ £4,091,926 │ £12,859,613 │
│ ” 1903 │ 12,081,388 │ 5,767,786 │ 17,849,174 │
│ ” 1905 │ 10,597,770 │ 10,262,581 │ 20,860,351 │
│ ” 1907 │ 10,026,932 │ 5,606,812 │ 15,633,744 │
│ ” 1908 │ 12,851,413 │ 4,607,266 │ 17,458,679 │
│ ” 1909 │ 10,235,483 │ 7,983,898 │ 18,219,381 │
│ ” 1910 │ 12,295,428 │ 12,799,094 │ 25,094,522 │
│ ” 1911 │ 13,566,922 │ 16,696,990 │ 30,263,912 │
│ ” 1912 │ 12,279,689 │ 18,390,013 │ 30,669,702 │
│ ” 1913 │ 19,543,900 │ 8,372,900 │ 27,916,800 │
└——────────——————┴————──────——┴———──────———┴——──────————–┘
(a) Excluding balances held in the Gold Standard Reserve.
It may be added that the Indian cash balances are kept partly in
District Treasuries all over the country, partly in Reserve Treasuries,
and partly on deposit at the Presidency Banks. The District Treasuries
do not usually contain more resources than they require for ordinary
transactions, and the balances in excess of immediate requirements,
which are transferred to the Reserve Treasuries, are mainly held in the
form of notes. Thus the Government has no large surplus stock of rupees
outside the Currency Reserve. The London Balances are held partly at
the Bank of England and partly on loan for short periods with certain
financial houses on an approved list.[62] No more than a working
balance (about £500,000) is ordinarily held at the Bank of England, and
this has been reckoned for many years now (though not formerly) amongst
the “other” deposits, not amongst the “public” deposits. It will be
seen from the table given above that the London Balances fell to a low
level in 1908, the Secretary of State making free use of them to aid
him in supporting exchange during the critical months of that year. On
October 30, 1908, these balances had sunk to £1,196,691. In 1911 and
1912, on the other hand, they reached a very high figure, and in June
of both these years exceeded £19,000,000. By the end of 1912 they had
sunk again to a more normal level. This abnormally high level in the
first half of 1912 gave rise to much criticism in regard both to the
amount of the balances and also to the method adopted of lending them
out in the London Money Market. Something will be said about this in
the concluding paragraphs of this chapter.
5. We are now in a position to see exactly what resources in sterling
and rupees respectively the Indian authorities have, on which to draw
for the fulfilment of their currency obligations. Since the surplus
balances in India, beyond those required by the District Treasuries and
those deposited with the Presidency Banks, are mainly held in notes, we
may neglect them for the present purpose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account