Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New TestamentNestle, Eberhard
Religion
Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament
Nestle, Eberhard
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, Textual
D. CODEX BEZAE CANTABRIGIENSIS, inferior to the foregoing in age,
compass, and repute, but perhaps surpassing all of them in importance,
by reason of its unique character. The manuscript was presented to the
University of Cambridge in 1581 by Calvin’s friend Theodore Beza, “ut
inter vere christianas antiquissimae plurimisque nominibus
celeberrimae.” It is not earlier than the beginning of the sixth
century, but is of peculiar importance as the oldest of the Greek-Latin
manuscripts of the Bible. It now contains, with certain lacunæ, the
Gospels (in the order Matthew, John, Luke, Mark), the concluding verses
of the Latin text of 3 John, followed immediately by the Acts, showing
that in this manuscript the Epistle of Jude either stood somewhere else
or was absent altogether. At least nine later hands can be distinguished
in it. The first scribe was more familiar with Latin than Greek, and
therefore inserts a Roman letter here and there in the middle of a Greek
word, and has frequently to use the sponge to wash out the mistakes he
makes in writing his manuscript.[67] Innumerable passages occur,
particularly in Luke and Acts, where the text of D differs in the most
remarkable manner from that of all the Greek manuscripts we are
acquainted with. It alone, _e.g._, contains after Luke vi. 4 the
incident of the man working in the field on the Sabbath day, to whom
Jesus said, “O Man, if thou knowest what thou doest, blessed art thou,
but if thou knowest not, thou art cursed and a transgressor of the Law.”
It is the only one also that has the words in Luke xi. 2, “when ye pray,
use not vain repetitions as the λοιποί.” In Luke xxiii. 53, it says that
the stone before the grave of Jesus was of such a size ὃν μόγις εἴκοσι
ἐκύλιον, an addition in which it has the support of only one Latin MS.
and the Sahidic Version. Again in Acts xii. 10, it is alone in recording
that there were seven steps down from the prison in Jerusalem (κατέβησαν
τοὺς ἑπτὰ βαθμούς). Other examples might be given of similar peculiar
interpolations for the explanation of which reference must be made to c.
III. below.
Its companion Latin text d is not translated directly from its own Greek
but from the Greek of the parent manuscript. Seeing that the manuscript
was discovered in the Monastery of Irenæus at Lyons, and that its text
agrees with the Scripture quotations found in that Father even in the
matter of clerical mistakes, it is possible that the Greek text is
derived from his copy. The Greek occupies the left-hand page of the open
volume, which is the place of honour. (_See Plates II and III._)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account