Investigation of Communist Activities in Seattle, Wash., Area, Hearings, Part 1United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
History
Investigation of Communist Activities in Seattle, Wash., Area, Hearings, Part 1
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
Communism -- Washington (State) -- Seattle
searched for signals before fixing an ambush. If they saw that
flowers are in the window and the person whom they have come to
arrest has tried by all means possible to take these flowers away,
the police insisted on putting them back in the place where they
were. So, when arranging safety signals for reporting places, it
is necessary to arrange them in such a way that they don’t strike
the eyes of the police and that they can be taken away without
being noticed by the police.
For verifying those who come to the reporting places, a system
of passwords is established. The comrade comes to the reporting
place, and he says some agreed-upon sentence. They answer to that
agreed-on sentence by some other agreed-on sentence. So both
comrades check each other. In Russian underground conditions
very complicated passwords were sometimes used in the central
appearing places. This was called forth by the circumstances that
different workers passed through such reporting places; rank and
file workers from the cells, district and Central Party workers.
Accordingly, one password was fixed for the rank and file worker,
a more complicated one for the district worker and still more
complicated one for the central worker. Why was this necessary? It
was necessary for conspirative reasons, since only certain things
could be said to the rank and file worker while perhaps other
things could be said to the district worker, whilst you could
speak with full frankness about the whole work of the illegal
organization to the representative of the Central Committee.
Therefore, passwords were, as they used to say at that time of
“three degrees of trust.” This was done in this way. The first
degree of trust: a comrade comes and says an agreed-upon sentence
and is replied to by an agreed-upon sentence. The second stage:
the comrade who has come in reply to the agreed-upon sentence
spoken to him, says another agreed-upon sentence, in reply to
which yet another agreed-upon sentence is spoken to him. The third
stage of trust: to the second agreed-upon sentence the comrade
replies by a third agreed-upon sentence. Then the keeper of the
appearing place also replies to the third agreed-upon sentence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account