Investigation of Communist activities in Seattle, Wash., Area, Hearings, Part 2United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
History
Investigation of Communist activities in Seattle, Wash., Area, Hearings, Part 2
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
Communism -- Washington (State) -- Seattle
Mr. DENNETT. At first he was not. But the Workers Alliance, of course,
was one of the organizations in which the Communist Party worked very
actively, and ultimately Mr. Armstrong became a member of the Communist
Party. I knew him when he was a member of the Communist Party.
Mr. TAVENNER. Was he active in Communist Party affairs?
Mr. DENNETT. Yes, he was quite active in the Communist Party affairs
for a short time. He later had differences with the party over policy,
and became too much of a Democrat to suit the Communists, and came to a
parting of the ways with the Communist Party.
Mr. TAVENNER. Can you give us the names of any other individuals,
active in the work of the Washington Commonwealth Federation or any
of its component parts, who were known to you to be members of the
Communist Party during that time?
Mr. DENNETT. Well, my random recollection is a little bit too
unreliable to go on. I think that I mentioned all of the principal ones
yesterday with the exception of Mr. Armstrong, whom I have explained
this morning.
Mr. TAVENNER. During the period that the organizational work was
being done by the Communist Party within the Washington Commonwealth
Federation was there in existence in the State of Washington an
organization known as the Washington Pension Union?
Mr. DENNETT. That is correct, there was. That was a organization which
came into existence principally because the Governor of the State had
ordered some cuts in the pension, or the assistance to the old-age
groups. It was prior to the organization of anything.
Mr. TAVENNER. Prior to the organization of what?
Mr. DENNETT. Of the union, of the Old-Age Pension Union.
It seems as though there was an attempt to cut on the relief, and some
of the relief authorities thought that they could cut the benefits to
the elderly people and there would be little protest for it. But Howard
Costigan, being very alert to the political possibilities, spoke about
it on the radio and, in response to that speaking, received many, many
calls by telephone and by letter asking him to do something about it.
He didn’t know what to do.
He came to the party of people and explained to us afterward that he
was perplexed but he was going to call a mass meeting and ask these
people to come and make their protests in public.
He did exactly that. The meeting was overwhelmingly successful; far
more elderly people arrived than he expected. The hall was packed
to overflowing, and he had to call more meetings to satisfy their
desire to express their protest. During the course of that, Costigan,
not knowing what else to do, suggested that they set up a permanent
committee to continue their protest against this form of relief cut.
The old-age people responded so vigorously that they themselves
determined that they must have a union. And they chose the name of
Old-Age Pension Union.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account