Investigation of Communist activities in Seattle, Wash., Area, Hearings, Part 2United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
History
Investigation of Communist activities in Seattle, Wash., Area, Hearings, Part 2
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities
Communism -- Washington (State) -- Seattle
(The witness confers with his counsel.)
Mr. MOULDER. What is your next question, Mr. Tavenner?
Mr. TAVENNER. Counsel is consulting the witness.
Mr. DENNETT. Counsel is calling my attention to the nature of your
question asking what steps can be recommended, and he is trying to
bring me back to that point a little more directly, and I appreciate
it. I hope you will bear with us on it.
Mr. TAVENNER. Let me suggest this to you:
My question was not so much directed at what you mentioned as it is
to this particular phase of the matter, that here is an organization
which had very proper purposes: It apparently had no desire to be
controlled or influenced by the Communist Party; but the Communist
Party determined it was going to take it over.
Now my point is: How, from your experience in the party, could this
group have successfully resisted being taken over by the Communist
Party?
(At this point Representative Harold H. Velde returned to the hearing
room.)
Mr. DENNETT. I think there is no one single guaranty. I think it
requires a number of changes in our behavior and in our attitude in the
various democratic organizations. I mean by that democratic in form; I
am not referring to a party as such.
In that respect, many people in the union to which I should belong have
asked me many times how could they guarantee that some untoward thing
would not occur in the organization. And it has been my recommendation
to them that the only guarantee anyone has is that he participate fully
in the life of his own organization and not delegate and not allow his
own responsibilities to be passed on to somebody else.
If you leave it to George, let George do it, you wake up some time and
find that George hasn’t done it the way you would have preferred to do
it or the way you would have done it had you been there.
And it is my firm conviction that one of the most hazardous parts
of our democratic process is the tendency of people to leave it to
somebody else to take care of their own responsibility.
If a democracy is to work, if it is to be a democracy or continue to be
a democracy, it is essential that each participant, each member be a
participant. That is the best recommendation I can make.
Mr. MOULDER. That is very true. In our investigations the committee has
found many instances where the Communist Party leaders have been able
to infiltrate into, say, a local union in the eastern section of this
country because the membership did not attend the elections and did
not vote and participate actively in the meetings. If there were other
means of voting than to be personally present, that might be avoided.
Mr. DENNETT. I favor referendum votes myself.
Mr. TAVENNER. In other words, the point you are making is: There is a
very great responsibility on each individual in his own organization
regardless of the organization.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account