Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society - Vol. 4: ZoologyLinnean Society of London
Science
Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society - Vol. 4: Zoology
Linnean Society of London
Zoology -- Periodicals
Dentalium.
Patella.
Nerita.
Helix.
Turbo.
Trochus.
Turricula.
Buccinum.
Lyra.
Morion.
Conus.
Voluta.
Strombus (not that of the 'Systema').
Harpago (=Strombus).
Murex.
Cassida.
Cypræa.
Bulla.
Haliotis.
Nautilus.
Cymbium (=Argonauta).
Spondylus.
Ostrea.
Pecten.
Arca.
Pinna.
Mytilus.
Solen.
Tellina.
Chama (not that of the 'Systema').
Cunnus (=Venus).
Pholas (not that of the 'Systema').
Trunculus (=Donax).
Bucardium (=Cardium).
Besides the four genera (_Chiton_, _Lepas_, _Teredo_, _Sabella_) that
were excluded from this catalogue, either from the absence of specimens,
or from mistrust of their being veritable Testacea, six of the
remaining 32, namely, _Pholas_, _Mya_, _Mactra_, _Chama_, _Anomia_, and
_Serpula_, were likewise omitted, not being yet eliminated from _Solen_,
_Bucardium_, _Spondylus_, _Ostrea_, and _Dentalium_. To counterbalance
these, we find no less than eight subsequently abandoned groupings:
_Turricula_ (an undefined amalgam of the long-spired species of
_Buccinum_, _Murex_, and _Strombus_).
_Lyra_ (the _Harpa_ and _Purpura_ of the Lamarckian school).
_Morion_ (an unnatural compound of _Eburna_, _Auricula_ proper,
_Pythia_, _&c._).
_Strombus_ (a combination of the immature members of the received genus
with _Pyrula_, _Fasciolaria_, and other allied forms).
_Cassida_ (nearly the modern _Cassis_).
_Pecten_ (equal to _Lima_ and _Pecten_).
_Chama_ (the _Tapes_ of recent conchologists).
_Pholas_ (chiefly composed of _Artemis_ and _Lucina_).
It may be remarked, moreover, that the simple univalves commence, and
the bivalves close the series; the exact converse of the order in which
they are marshalled in the two principal editions of the 'Systema
Naturæ.'
I feel assured, after a careful study of the manuscript, that the names
eventually allotted to the shells of the 'Museum' did not result from a
careful comparison of the royal specimens with the typical examples in
the private collection of our author, but were attached to the species,
either from the identity of the written and printed synonymy, or from
the general accordance of their described features with the meagre
characteristics enumerated in the prior publication.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account