Russian literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism
Then there is in his work a note of wistful tenderness that steals into
the heart and fills it with an incommunicable pleasureable sadness, as
do the songs you hear in Russia on dark summer nights in the villages,
or, better still, on the broad waters of some huge silent river,--songs
aching with an ecstasy of homesickness, songs which are something
half-way between the whining sadness of Oriental music and the
rippling plaintiveness of Irish and Scotch folk-song; songs that are
imperatively melodious, but strange to us in their rhythm, constantly
changing yet subordinated to definite law, varying indeed with an
invariable law; songs whose notes, without being definitely sharp or
flat, seem a little bit higher, or a shade lower than you expect, and
in which certain notes come over and over again with an insistent
appeal, a heartbreaking iteration, and an almost intolerable pathos;
songs which end abruptly and suddenly, so that you feel that they are
meant to begin again at once and to go on for ever.
This is how Tourgeniev’s poetical quality--as manifested in his
_Sportsman’s Sketches_, his _Poems in Prose_, and in many other of
his works--strikes me. But I doubt if any one unacquainted with the
Russian language would derive such impressions, for it is above all
things Tourgeniev’s language--the words he uses and the way in which
he uses them--that is magical. Every sentence is a phrase of perfect
melody; limpid, simple and sensuous. And all this must necessarily half
disappear in a translation, however good.
But then Tourgeniev is not only a poet. He is a great novelist and
something more than a great novelist. He has recorded for all time the
atmosphere of a certain epoch. He has done for Russia what Trollope
did for England: he has exactly conveyed the atmosphere and the tone
of the fifties. The characters of Trollope and Tourgeniev are excelled
by those of other writers--and I do not mean to put Tourgeniev on
the level of Trollope, because Tourgeniev is an infinitely greater
writer and an artist of an altogether higher order--; but for giving
the general picture and atmosphere of England during the fifties, I do
not believe any one has excelled Trollope; and for giving the general
atmosphere of the fifties in Russia, of a certain class, I do not
believe any one--with the possible exception of Aksakov, the Russian
Trollope,--has excelled what Tourgeniev did in his best known books,
_Fathers and Sons_, _Virgin Soil_, and _A House of Gentlefolk_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account