Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
Grosseteste fought the extortionate papal demands for Church revenues
all the time. In 1239, with his fellow bishops, he tells Otho plainly
that the Church is drained dry by the grasping importunity of Rome.
Otho left in 1241, and that same year saw Boniface of Savoy, a
handsome, soldierly man appointed to Canterbury as St. Edmund’s
successor. The following year came a new extortioner from Rome, named
Martin, an altogether inferior person to Otho, but with all the
legate’s powers of suspension and excommunication. His confiscations
and rapacity provoked a remonstrance to the pope even from Henry.
Martin at last, in 1245, had to fly for his life from England, and
when Grosseteste subsequently had a calculation made of the English
Church revenues enjoyed by foreigners, it was found that the incomes
of foreign clerks appointed by Pope Innocent IV. amounted to more than
70,000 marks--more than treble the king’s income. And all this was done
in spite of refusals by Grosseteste to appoint illiterates or allow
boys to hold benefices.
The barons sided with the Church against Martin, and drew up a long
protest which they sent to the pope at the council of Lyons in 1245. In
this they complained:--That the pope, not content with Peter’s Pence,
which had been paid cheerfully from old times, wrung money from the
Church against the law of the realm, without the king’s permission; and
that the pope wrongfully put ignorant, covetous, or absentee Italians
into English livings notwithstanding his own promises, the rights of
patrons, and the privileges of the English clergy. A year later the
protest was repeated with another item objecting to the pope’s claim to
recall former charters.
Innocent IV.’s answer to this was to threaten to dethrone Henry as
he had dethroned his brother-in-law, the Emperor Frederick. The king
weakly said no more, the barons, without a leader, were equally silent,
and the Church continued “to sate the greed of Rome.”
But in Grosseteste there was no spirit of surrender. In 1253, the
very last year of his life, he was called upon by the pope to
provide a nephew of his with a canonry at Lincoln, and the bishop’s
letter of refusal is, perhaps, the only well remembered thing of all
Grosseteste’s writings. This letter was not, as commonly stated, sent
to the pope but to his representative who was also named Innocent.[38]
“The pope has power to build up,” wrote Grosseteste, “but not to pull
down. These appointments tend to destruction, not edification, being of
man’s device and not according to the words of the Apostles or the will
of Christ. By my very love and obedience to the Holy See I must refuse
obedience in things altogether opposed to the sanctity of the Apostolic
See and contrary to Catholic unity. As a son and a servant I decline to
obey, and this refusal must not be taken as rebellion, for it is done
in reverence to divine commands.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account