Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
AEGINA, though not in Peloponnesus, belongs to it more than to any
other country out of Peloponnesus. According to the statement which
makes its circumference largest, it amounted only to 180 stadia, or
about twenty-two English miles; it is therefore probably much smaller
than it is generally drawn in our maps, and its importance is to us a
real mystery, seeing that as a maritime power it was not only equal
but superior to Athens. Yet the mystery may perhaps be solved. Hydra
and Spezzia are barren rocks, which Aegina is not; they are also
smaller than Aegina, and yet their maritime pursuits procured them a
population of several thousands; the soil of the small state of Ragusa
is rocky, and produces no more corn than is required for a few months,
and yet Ragusa as a republic kept many hundred ships, and even during
the present revolution it has had many ships, some of which were well
armed. When, however, we read of an Aeginetan fleet of from seventy to
eighty galleys, each of which required about 200 marines, we cannot
suppress our astonishment. Still more surprising is the statement of
Athenaeus, that the island once had 470,000 slaves, for which he refers
to no less an authority than Aristotle. There must be some error here,
or else Athenaeus had misunderstood Aristotle, for the statement is
absolutely impossible. The highest prosperity of Aegina belongs to a
period when slavery did not yet prevail very much in Greece; and at
other times, as I shall show presently, Aegina was by no means populous.
We may indeed well understand that the island, which at an early period
had a democratic form of government, may have had a navy more powerful
than that of Athens before the time of Themistocles, as Athens had so
long been governed by its great aristocratic landowners. During the
period between the Pisistratids and the Persian wars, the struggle
for the supremacy was carried on between Athens and Aegina with great
exasperation and varying success, until Themistocles decided it by
inducing Athens to apply all her energy to her navy, to make Phaleros a
good harbour, and to build an imposing fleet. During the period between
the Persian and Peloponnesian wars, the Athenians had the upper hand and
subdued the Aeginetans; at the commencement of the Peloponnesian war, the
Athenians expelled the inhabitants of Aegina from their island, because
they did not trust them, and the Lacedaemonians gave up Cythera (Cerigo)
to them.[25] The fact that they maintained and supported themselves there
is a proof that their number was very small. After the Peloponnesian war
they were led back, but although Athens was so much reduced, Aegina never
recovered its former importance. During the first war between Philip and
the Romans, P. Sulpicius took Aegina, and reduced the whole population
to slavery, from which they were afterwards ransomed by the kindness of
their friends on the mainland.[26] Afterwards it fell into the hands of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account