Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc. — John Shaqi
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
the kings of Pergamus; but we do not know whether it remained under their
dominion until the overthrow of the Achaean confederacy. Aegina is one of
those places whose destruction Serv. Sulpicius laments in his consolatory
letter to Cicero. It seems to have been during such a devastation that
the temple of Zeus Hellenios perished, among the ruins of which were
found the celebrated Aegina marbles, which are at present in the museum
of Munich.
LACONIA.
Laconia was of different extent at different times. Laconia, in the reign
of Aristodemus and his sons, or the country such as it was originally at
the time of the Heracleid conquest, was very far from being as large as
the land afterwards bearing the same name; it was not even as large as
the Laconia in Strabo or Pausanias, but perhaps similar to what it was
during the Macedonian period, especially after the death of Nabis, when
the fate of Lacedaemon had been determined by the Achaeans. The Heracleid
Laconia, therefore, at the first distribution of the peninsula, could
hardly be compared with the Heracleid Argos.
As regards the origin of the kingdom of Sparta, the tradition that
Eurysthenes and Procles were twin-sons of Aristodemus, is altogether
mythical.[27] Any one familiar with the spirit of ancient legendary
history, can clearly see the process through which the narrative has
passed. Both Herodotus and a fragment of Alcaeus have preserved the
statement, that, according to the common tradition, Aristodemus himself
reigned at Sparta and died there. But later writers represent him as
having died before he arrived with the Heracleids in Peloponnesus, being
killed by Apollo at Pytho. The fact is, that as his name was not found
among those of the Doric chiefs, tradition made him the father of the
two kings, for as Argos had three, so Sparta had two kings corresponding
with the two highest among the phylae; and the two Spartan kings are
nothing but the heads of the two γένη of the Eurypontids and Agiads,
belonging to two different phylae; one of them is designated as the οἰκίη
ὑποδεεστέρη, because it belonged to the less noble phyle; whence we
cannot be surprised at their not being called Eurysthenids and Proclids.
Aristodemus is merely a mythical name, signifying that his descendants
are the noblest among their people. The conquerors of Sparta, on their
arrival, are said to have found Tisamenus, the son of Orestes. Those
who looked upon this tradition as a piece of genuine history, felt that
it was difficult to see, how the son of Orestes had come from Mycenae
to Sparta; and the ancients extricated themselves by the story, that
Orestes, succeeded to the throne of Menelaus by marrying Hermione—a
story which is unknown to the author of the first part of the Odyssey,
for he speaks of Megapenthes, a son of Menelaus, which again is only
an expression of the general idea, that the house of Menelaus ended in
sorrow. There can be no doubt that the most ancient form of the tradition
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account