Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
is this, that Temenus, the Doric king of Argos, possessed the same
supremacy over the sons of Aristodemus at Sparta, and over Cresphontes
in Messene, as had in former times been exercised by the king of Mycenae
over the whole of Achaean Peloponnesus. But Spartan pride, at an early
time, endeavoured to cast this humiliating tradition into the shade.
Hence also the statement that Cresphontes drew lots, as to whether he
should obtain Laconia or Messene, Argos being altogether out of the
question.
It is only from a fragment of Ephorus in Strabo, that we know anything
about the feudal principalities of the Dorians in Laconia. This piece
of information once hung upon a thread, and was nearly destroyed by a
mutilation of the passage in the manuscript from which all the others are
derived; if the book were lost, or but a little more mutilated, we should
know absolutely nothing about this feudal system—so much our knowledge
of the most important circumstances often depends upon a mere accident.
Hence it is quite legitimate, in case of such information being wanting,
to supply the deficiency with rational boldness, in accordance with the
general principles of historical development. Now, according to Ephorus,
the Dorian kings divided Laconia into six principalities. The first was
Sparta, where they themselves exercised the supremacy over the other
principalities, just as the Capetingian kings of Paris and Orleans, who
ruled over the country as far as Orleans (Isle de France) as a distinct
principality, and were recognised as kings in the rest of France, but in
such a manner that their vassals again, within their own territories,
were true princes or kings. In regard to the other principalities, Strabo
(p. 424, D)[28] says, that _Amyclae_, at a distance of about five miles
from Sparta, was given to the Achaean who, by his faithless counsel, had
induced the Achaean king of the time to capitulate and quit his country;
he is elsewhere called Philonomus.[29] The text of Strabo is here much
mutilated; there is one line of which the greater part is legible, and
of the next only a few words. I am convinced, however, that I have
discovered the meaning, namely, that the remaining four kingdoms were
_Las_, _Helos_, _Aepys_, and _Pherae_, the two last of which subsequently
belonged to Messene.[30] These five states then stood to Sparta in the
relation of isopolity, and their citizens might exercise the Spartan
franchise; but the sovereignty in all foreign relations belonged to
Sparta, so that the Spartan conquest at that time imposed no heavy yoke
upon the feudal principalities. This relation was altered by Agis I.[31]
The Spartan Dorians broke through the relation of these isopolite states
in such a manner as boldly to deprive them of their rights, to depose
the kings, and reduce the inhabitants to the condition of περίοικοι, in
which they remained indeed free, but became dependent and lost the right
of exercising the Spartan franchise.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account