Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The nature of the country has already been described in general terms;
a minute description of the complicated mountains, would give you no
definite view, but only confound you. According to the general belief
of the Greeks, the Arcadians[37] were the most ancient inhabitants of
Peloponnesus, that is, Pelasgians: in the history of nations, Arcadia
is regarded as the original seat of the Greek Pelasgians. The Arcadian
traditions are the only ones in Greece, that go back to the creation of
man, and their Azan necessarily reminds us of Adam; but whether they
had a similar tradition, or whether the resemblance of the names is
only accidental, is a question which I cannot venture to decide. They
considered themselves, however, as autochthons in the strictest sense of
the term; though this belief referred to the rulers rather than to the
whole nation. While the adjoining countries changed either their rulers
or their inhabitants, the population of Arcadia remained quite intact.
In the most ancient traditions we hear of no important towns, but we
know three races, the _Azanes_ (Ἀζῆνες in Herodotus), the _Maenalii_ and
_Parrhasii_; whether, however, they are to be regarded only as three
tribes, or as three distinct nations, I cannot say. Greek history, at the
time of the Messenian wars, speaks indeed of Arcadia as one entire state,
under a single head, but such is not the case in the Homeric Catalogue;
it is probable that they formed one whole only through the relation of
isopolity. Afterwards, about the 40th Olymp., we find the first traces
of towns, the importance of which, however, cannot be determined. In a
war with Sparta, the inhabitants of Tegea appear as a separate state
of Tegeatans, and they must have had the supremacy among the Arcadians,
for otherwise we cannot explain how they could have claimed at Plataeae
the supreme command of the whole army, on the ground of their being the
most ancient Greeks, in opposition to the Dorians, who had immigrated.
How Arcadia was divided among its three peoples, is unknown. It is
surprising that, previous to the foundation of Megalopolis, the whole
of southern Arcadia, which formed nearly one-half of the whole country,
appears to have contained no towns of importance, owing to which very
circumstance Megalopolis became conspicuous. All the more important towns
were situated on the eastern frontier; near the northern boundary there
also were towns, which afterwards appear as small states, but the towns
themselves, though strong from their natural position, were unimportant.
But this was the fate of all Greek nations, where they were not grouped
round a common centre: the division increased more and more, and single
towns rose by their favourable position, and isolated themselves from the
Κοινόν. The most ancient and most important town of Arcadia was in the
east.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account