Lectures on the rise and development of medieval architecture; vol. 1Scott, George Gilbert, Sir
History
Lectures on the rise and development of medieval architecture; vol. 1
Scott, George Gilbert, Sir
Architecture, Gothic; Architecture, Medieval
Oriental manufactures, are to be traced in the Romanesque ornaments, and
were the origin of many of those most familiar to us, actual
architectural features of Classic form, such as capitals, do not seem to
have been very directly copied, excepting where the remains of antique
buildings were at hand to offer models. The Romanesque capitals of
earlier date are, in many cases, of types belonging to no other style,
though in others they betray a distant descent from the Roman; and the
cushion capital, and perhaps others, seem derived from Byzantium; but
generally their forms differ much from the original, till we approach
the period of which I am treating, when suddenly they assume an almost
Classic form--the acanthus being freely used, and that of a variety
resembling that of ancient Greece (Fig. 18), as distinguished from Rome
(Fig. 19); and the same Greek leafage being found in cornices (Fig. 21),
scroll-work (Fig. 20), and almost every other position in which it could
be used. Not having travelled in the south of France, I will not venture
to be very dogmatic as to the cause of this sudden change. I fancy,
from such drawings as I have seen, that this Byzantine capital prevails
a good deal in the south of France, but I am not able with certainty to
distinguish it from the capitals directly imitated from Classic remains
around.[13] M. Viollet de Duc views them all as being of this origin,
calling them Gallo-Romaine, as distinguished from the Romanesque
capitals found side by side with them. I view those, however, I am
treating of as _distinctly Byzantine_, and the following facts suggest a
route by which the purely Byzantine foliage may have reached the north
of France.
[Illustration: Fig. 20.--Scroll, St. Denis.]
[Illustration: Fig. 21--Part of a Cornice, St. Denis.]
The Church of St. Mark, at Venice, was erected between the years 977 and
1071, and its capitals are, many of them, precisely of the kind I am
naming (Fig. 22), and are also identical with many at Constantinople
(Fig. 23). No one who has had a training in drawing the Corinthian
capital will fail to recognise at Venice that variety of the acanthus by
which he has been accustomed to distinguish the Greek from the Roman
Corinthian. According to M. de Verneill, the Church of St. Frond, at
[Illustration: Fig. 22.--Capital from the Church of St. Mark, Venice.]
[Illustration: Fig 23.--Capital from St. John’s, Constantinople.]
[Illustration: Fig. 24.--Capital from the Church of St. Frond,
Perigueux.]
[Illustration: Fig. 25.--Fragment of Capital from St. Frond, Perigueux.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account