London in the Jacobite times, Volume IIDoran, Dr. (John)
History
London in the Jacobite times, Volume II
Doran, Dr. (John)
London (England) -- History -- 18th century
It was on the 15th of February, 1744, after there had been some
difficulty to persuade people of the impending danger, that the king
informed Parliament and the nation, that this kingdom was about to be
invaded by the French, with the design of overthrowing the present
happy establishment, and the Protestant succession, and of restoring
the Stuarts and the Romish religion. In the debates which ensued in
both Houses, all the occasional references to Jacobites seemed to have
come together in one heap. Lord Orford (Walpole) reminded the peers how
he had been calumniated and ridiculed for repeating that the Jacobites
had never ceased to plot, and that they would one day renew their
attempt to destroy the present dynasty. ◆[Sidenote: _PREPARATIONS._]◆
If England was not ready to meet this attempt, the fault would be
with those who were now in power. Lord Chesterfield still maintained
that the Jacobites in the metropolis were few, and that hostility
to the Government was chiefly maintained there by the malicious and
contemptible sect of Nonjurors. One Jacobite member in the Commons,
Sir Francis Dashwood, was audacious, at least by inuendoes. Alluding
to the harsh epithets flung at the Chevalier, he remarked that James
II. had branded as an invader and usurper that William of Orange, who
was afterwards hailed by the country as its glorious deliverer. He
referred also to the incident in Roman history of the Roman soldiers
refusing to march against foreign invaders till they had destroyed the
tyranny which reigned at Rome. The application of these remarks was
easy enough. They showed the spirit of the Jacobite party, particularly
in London. The natural result ensued, namely, a proclamation to the
justices to put in force the laws which had been framed against Papists
and Nonjurors. The former were ordered to remove to a distance of at
least ten miles from the metropolis, or to keep close within their
habitations. Those persons who refused to take the oaths of allegiance
and abjuration were to be deprived of their arms and horses; and
every attempt at rioting was to be put down by armed force. Further,
every person found corresponding with the Pretender or his sons were
pronounced to be guilty of High Treason,――which involved forfeiture
of life, title, and estates. If this seems stringent, it must be
remembered that already had there been caught and caged in Newgate
a Popish priest, who, putting in action the teaching of his Church
that it only interfered with religion,――and with morals, which means
everything else,――had, in the disguise of an imaginary captainship,
been trying to enlist men into the service of the enemy.
[Sidenote: _DECLARATION OF WAR._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account