Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.Various
Religion
Lucifer: A Theosophical Magazine. Volume I. September 1887-February 1888.
Various
Theosophy -- Periodicals
Granting, then, that it is the Great Law of Harmony or Karma which
governs the Universe, and which is the Divine principle under one aspect
manifested in Nature, then it is easy to understand that any action in
violation of Nature’s laws will produce a deviation from the straight
line of harmony; consequently the law of harmony will produce an
adjusting effect. Now, who is to produce that effect? Nature, or the man
who committed the action? Both, or rather, the latter under the
influence of the former. The latter most certainly, unless man is to be
regarded simply as a blind puppet. It is possible to compare the
situation to that of a man whose progress is contingent upon an exact
balance being preserved on a pair of scales in front of him. If his
actions disturb the balance of those scales and add weight to one side
or the other, it is necessary immediately to add a counter-balancing
weight on the opposite side and so restore the balance or harmony. (Of
course this is a physical illustration, and can hardly be carried very
far on the moral plane.) That is to say that the one Divine principle is
divided by man’s actions into two opposing forces of good and evil, and
man’s progress depends on the exertion of his will to preserve harmony
and prevent deviation to one side or the other. Evil only exists in
contradistinction to good, and the preservation of such harmony as we
have and the advance towards Universal Harmony—the abstract divinity—is
what all right-minded persons theoretically aspire to.
It has been thought that, in consequence of the attention paid to the
classics in education, the word Nemesis would replace Karma with
advantage. So perhaps it might have done, had the earliest traditions of
Greek mythology been preserved. But the fatal tendency towards
anthropomorphism set in very strongly even in the palmy days of Greece,
and in consequence Nemesis only pourtrayed the personification of a
human passion. Originally the balancing power, independent of Zeus and
all the Olympian gods, who carried out her decrees, Nemesis became
simply the avenging deity; so much was this the case that in a general
sense she might have been called the tutelary deity of those envious of
their neighbour’s happiness. Between these points Nemesis appears as the
personification of the moral reverence for law, of the natural fear of
committing a wrong action, and hence the personification of conscience.
It was after this period that Nemesis was said to direct human affairs,
with a view to restore the balance between happiness and unhappiness.
But, in earlier times, the idea of Nemesis was divided into those of
_Nemesis_ and _Adrasteia_ (or what Orientalists would call good and evil
Karma), for even then the idea of evil was beginning to be attached to
Nemesis.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account