Lynch-law; an investigation into the history of lynching in the United StatesCutler, James Elbert
Philosophy
Lynch-law; an investigation into the history of lynching in the United States
Cutler, James Elbert
Lynching -- United States
“Acknowledged and subscribed in the presence of
“C——T. H——n,
“J——P. D——n,”
and five others, who seem to have been a portion of “the fellow-citizens
of this settlement,” referred to in the document.[132]
The companies of Regulators were generally organized only temporarily to
meet some emergency in particular communities. The one striking
exception is the Regulation movement in the Carolinas. The circumstances
surrounding that movement, however, were not paralleled elsewhere. The
duration and strength of the organization there, was undoubtedly due to
the prominence of the political factor in its existence. Leaving out of
consideration the Carolina Regulation and the summary practices which
were incident to the Revolutionary War, there existed almost exclusively
down to 1830 what may be called the frontier type of lynch-law pure and
simple. This form of lynch-law procedure has always been justified on
the ground of necessity, and has been condemned only because of its
liability to abuse. As one writer has said, referring to the Regulators:
“Their acts may sometimes have been high-handed and unjustifiable, but
on the whole—and it is only in such a view that social institutions are
to be estimated—they were the preservers of the communities for whom
they acted. In time, it is true, they degenerated, and sometimes the
corps fell into the hands of the very men they were organized to punish.
“Every social organization is liable to misdirection, and this, among
others, has been perverted to the furtherance of selfish and
unprincipled purposes; for, like prejudices and habits of thought,
organized institutions frequently survive the necessities which call
them into existence. Abuses grow up under all systems; and, perhaps, the
worst abuse of all, is a measure or expedient, good though temporary,
retained after the passing away of the time for which it was
adopted.”[133]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account