Machine-Gun TacticsApplin, R. V. K. (Reginald Vincent Kempenfeldt)
History
Machine-Gun Tactics
Applin, R. V. K. (Reginald Vincent Kempenfeldt)
Machine guns
there is far less danger of accidentally hitting the attacking
infantry with machine guns than with artillery fire. Direct fire
should only be used when it is impossible to use indirect fire on
account of the nature of the ground in the vicinity.
Indirect fire from the reverse slope of a hill has the advantage
of concealing the guns and rendering them immune from artillery
fire. The position must be carefully selected with due regard to
the slope in its relation to fire from the enemy as laid down in
chap. ii. p. 67, of _Training Manuals Appendix_, 1905. The best
position is just below the crest of a steep slope, as observation
of fire is rendered easier and the effect of shrapnel minimised.
The safety of the infantry in front will depend entirely on the
range, height of the guns above the infantry, and the position of
the target (enemy). On level ground the range must not be less
than 800 yards,[18] and the infantry will be perfectly safe at all
distances between 200 yards from the guns and 200 yards from the
enemy. (See table, Appendix A.) The methods of employing indirect
fire have been given at the end of Chapter II., and its success
will depend largely upon the careful observation of fire by the
section commanders, who must concentrate their attention on this
alone--the battery commander giving the signal for opening and
ceasing fire, and the target or direction of fire for each section.
Machine guns used as covering fire have ample time for preparation;
and as ranges can be accurately taken, and great deliberation used
in selecting positions, observing fire, and correcting errors, the
maximum of accuracy should be attained. If the enemy is entrenched
against frontal fire, good results may be expected from accurate
distant fire, owing to the angle of descent of the bullet causing
the low parapet or shallow trench to be no protection.
They were successfully used by the Japanese as covering fire for
infantry in the attack, as the following examples will show: “At
Mukden on March 1st all the machine guns of a whole Japanese
division (12 to 18 guns) were brought into action upon a Russian
_point d’appui_. The Russian fire was silenced, but burst out again
whenever the machine-gun fire slackened. The Japanese infantry used
these pauses in the enemy’s fire to press forward to close range
_under cover of their machine-gun fire_.”[19] On March 2nd the
three machine guns of the 10th Japanese Infantry Regiment acted in
the same way against a Russian fieldwork. This method of employing
machine guns requires the closest co-operation with the infantry
from the commencement of the attack.
Again, during the Japanese attack on Namako Yama the infantry
were greatly assisted by covering fire from their machine guns
directed on the Russian trenches. These guns were used from behind
_screens_, and their success was largely due to their being well
concealed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account