Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical IntroductionMcKechnie, William Sharp
History
Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John: With an Historical Introduction
McKechnie, William Sharp
Constitutional history -- England -- Sources; Law -- England -- History; Law -- England -- Sources; Magna Carta
To justify these inferences, a more detailed examination of the evidence
available will be necessary. The earliest meeting between John and the
baronial leaders, all authorities are agreed, took place on Monday, 15th
June, probably in the early morning. The barons undoubtedly came to the
conference provided with an accurate list of those grievances which they
were determined to have redressed. On the previous 27th of April the
rebels had sent a written Schedule to the King, along with a demand that
he should signify his acceptance by affixing his seal;[35] they are not
likely to have been less fully prepared on 15th June.
-----
Footnote 35:
R. Wendover, III. 298.
-----
John, on his part, would naturally try a policy of evasions and delays;
and, when these were clearly useless, would then endeavour to secure
modifications of the terms offered. These tactics met with no success.
His opponents demanded a plain acceptance of their plainly expressed
demands. Before nightfall, John, overawed by their firmness and by the
numbers of the armed force behind them, was constrained to surrender.
Leaving minor points of detail to be subsequently adjusted, he
provisionally accepted the substance of the long list of reforms put
before him by the barons, on the understanding that they would renew
their allegiance and give him some security that they would keep the
peace. In proof of this bargain, the heads of the agreement were rapidly
engrossed on parchment to the number of forty-nine, and the great seal
was impressed on the wax of the label, where it may still be seen.[36]
-----
Footnote 36:
In the British Museum. See _infra_ under Part V.
-----
The parchment containing these Articles of the Barons may have been the
identical Schedule actually prepared by the rebel leaders previous to
the meeting; but, more probably, it was written out at Runnymede during
the conference on the 15th (or between two conferences on that day) by
one of the clerks of the royal Chancery. This is more in keeping with
its heading (written in the same hand, and apparently at the same time
as the body of the deed), _Ista sunt capitula quae barones petunt et
dominus rex concedit_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account