Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. MahanMahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
History
Mahan on naval warfare : $b Selections from the writing of Rear Admiral Alfred T. Mahan
Mahan, A. T. (Alfred Thayer)
Naval art and science; Naval strategy; Sea-power
You will remember that in the war with Spain the United States navy had
reproduced for it the situation I have depicted, of a detachment trying
to pass round the Danube from North to South. The “Oregon” was the
detachment, and she had to join the American fleet in the West Indies,
in spite of the Spanish squadron. She reached Barbados May 18; the day
before Cervera entered Santiago, and six days after he left Martinique,
which is only one hundred miles from Barbados. The utter inefficiency of
the Spanish navy has caused us to lose sight of the risk to the
“Oregon,” which was keenly felt by her commander, and concerning which
at the moment two former secretaries of the navy expressed to me their
anxiety. Despite this experience, there are those now who would
reconstitute it for us, half the fleet in the Pacific and half in the
Atlantic. Should then war arise with a European state, or with Japan, it
would be open to either enemy to take the Danube position between our
two divisions, as Togo did between the Port Arthur and the Baltic
squadrons....
_Concentration_
The general war against the House of Austria, as conducted by Richelieu,
appears to have suffered from the same cause that saps the vigor of many
wars; he attempted too many things at once, instead of concentrating for
decided superiority in some one or two localities. For such
concentration he had good opportunities, owing to the central position
and interior lines possessed by France. It was open to him to act in
great force either in Belgium, or on the Rhine, or in Italy, or towards
Spain. Moreover, he had the initial advantage of a natural
concentration: one nation against two, and those separated in space. The
proverbial weakness of alliances is due to inferior power of
concentration. Granting the same aggregate of force, it is never as
great in two hands as in one, because it is not perfectly concentrated.
Each party to an alliance usually has its particular aim, which divides
action. In any military scheme that comes before you, let your first
question to yourself be, Is this consistent with the requirement of
concentration? Never attempt to straddle, to do two things at the same
time, unless your force is evidently so supreme that you have clearly
more than enough for each.
Our profession has never produced a man more daring in enterprise, nor
more skillful in management, than Nelson. Remember, therefore, and
always, that, when he sent off two frigates on some expedition, he
charged their captains:
“If you meet two enemies, do not each attack one. Combine both on one of
the enemy; you will make sure of that one, and you may also get the
other afterwards; but, whether the second escape or not, your country
will have won a victory, and gained a ship.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account