The coraco-acromial and coraco-clavicular ligaments are usually torn, and the detached fragment, along with the head of the humerus, sinks into the axilla, causing a flattening of the shoulder, and leaving a depression below the projecting acromion. These signs may be obscured by the general swelling of the shoulder. The arm may be lengthened about an inch. By supporting the arm the deformity is at once reduced, but recurs as soon as the support is withdrawn. Crepitus is usually detected on carrying out this manipulation; and the coracoid process is found to move with the arm and not with the scapula. By these tests, and by the X-rays, this injury is distinguished from a dislocation. A partial fracture carrying away the lower part of the _glenoid cavity_ simulates a sub-glenoid dislocation. This is, however, a rare injury. The _treatment_ consists in bracing back the shoulders and supporting the elbow, and this is most satisfactorily done by a body bandage and sling for the elbow, as for fracture of the middle third of the clavicle. Passive movements and massage are employed from the first. #Fracture of the acromion process# may result from a blow or fall on the shoulder. It is often overlooked on account of the swelling resulting from bruising of the soft parts, and the absence of marked displacement. On palpation, crepitus and an irregularity at the seat of fracture may sometimes be detected. The shoulder is slightly flattened, and abduction of the arm is difficult. In rare cases the fracture passes into the acromio-clavicular joint, and is associated with dislocation of the clavicle. In connection with this fracture, reference must be made to a condition frequently met with, in which the epiphysial portion of the acromion is found to be separate from the body of the process--_separate acromion_. This is by some (Symington, Hamilton) looked upon as a want of union of the epiphysis, but the weight of evidence seems to prove that it is rather of the nature of an un-united fracture at this level, even when, as sometimes happens, it is bilateral (Struthers, Arbuthnot Lane). Between the fourteenth and twenty-second years a true _separation of the epiphysis_ may be met with, but it is seldom possible to make a positive diagnosis of this injury. As is the case in all fractures of the acromion, bony union seldom takes place. The _treatment_ is the same as for fracture of the lateral end of the clavicle.