Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
1. That the Censors had no power to commit the Plaintiff for any of the
causes mentioned in the Bar, because the said clause which gives power
to the said Censors to fine and imprison, does not extend to the said
clause, viz. _That none in the said City, &c. exercise the said
faculty_, &c. which prohibits every one from practising Physic in
London, &c. without licence of the President and College; but extends
only to punish those who practise in London, _Pro delictis suis in non
bene exequendo faciendo et utendo Facultate Medicinæ_, so that their
power (of fine and imprisonment) is limited to the ill and not to the
good use and practice.[88]
2. Admitting that the Censors had power, yet they have not pursued it.
1. Because the Censors alone have power to fine and imprison, whereas
here the President and Censors imposed this fine of five pounds. 2. The
plaintiff was summoned to appear before the President and Censors, and
for not appearing was fined five pounds, whereas the President had no
authority.
3. The fines imposed by them by virtue of this act belong to the king
and not to them,[89] and yet the fine is limited to be paid to
themselves, &c. and for nonpayment they have imprisoned him.
4. They ought to have committed the Plaintiff immediately, though no
time be limited in this act.
5. Their proceedings ought not to be by parol, inasmuch as their
authority is by patent and act of parliament, and especially it being to
fine and imprison.
6. The Act giving a power to imprison until he be delivered by the
President and Censors or their successors, shall be taken strictly, or
otherwise the liberty of the subject is at their pleasure. And this is
well proved by a judgment in Parliament in the same case; for when this
act of 14. _Hen._ 8. had given the Censors power to imprison, yet it was
taken so literally, that the gaoler was not bound to receive such as
they should commit to him, because they had authority to imprison
without any Court; and thereupon the Statute 1 _Mary_, _cap._ 9, was
made to compel the gaoler to receive them under a penalty, and yet none
can commit to prison unless the gaoler receives him; but the 14 _Hen._
8, was taken so literally that no necessary incident was implied.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account