Medical symbolism in connection with historical studies in the arts of healing and hygieneSozinskey, Thomas S.
History
Medical symbolism in connection with historical studies in the arts of healing and hygiene
Sozinskey, Thomas S.
Symbolism in medicine
The idea has been advanced that the commonest of the species of serpent,
_Elaphis Æsculapii_, described above, at Epidaurus, where the myth of the
Grecian god of medicine first took definite shape, affords an adequate
explanation of the association of the reptile with medicine. This may
have had a little to do with it. I cannot admit, however, that it did
more than, perhaps, emphasize somewhat the association. If such were its
origin, the association could not be viewed otherwise than as incidental,
and hence the serpent might be without any special meaning.
After referring to some strange curative virtue attributed to
serpents, Pliny says: “Hence it is that the snake is consecrated to
Æsculapius.”[184] Here is a specimen of them given by the rather
credulous old Roman: “It is a well-known fact that for all injuries
inflicted by serpents, and those even of an otherwise incurable nature,
it is an excellent remedy to apply the entrails of the serpent itself to
the wound.”[185] The principle is obviously the same as that illustrated
in the old custom of applying a hair of the dog to cure the wound caused
by the bite of the animal. In many parts of the world, the serpent has
been accorded great virtue as a medicine, and in China and elsewhere
such is the case even to this day. In fact, apart from the preposterous
and numerous uses to which it is put by homœopathic doctors, is not the
venom of the most deadly species declared by leading members of the
profession to be a capital cure for various serious ills? However,
Dr. D. G. Brinton quotes the rather striking observation of Agassiz,
that “the Maues Indians, who live between the Upper Tapajos and Madeira
Rivers in Brazil, whenever they assign a form to any ‘remedio,’ give it
that of a serpent.”[186] But, in spite of the wide belief in the virtue
of the serpent as a medicine, I cannot accept the opinion of Pliny,
that it affords a sufficient explanation of the matter in question. Its
actual healing properties were assuredly too equivocal to merit such
distinction. With all its virtues, _soma_ itself received little or no
more.
The fabled power of the serpent to discover herbs of curative virtues
has been suggested as an explanation of the association of it with
medicine. This is based on a traditional episode in the history of
Æsculapius, which reminds one of the German story of the Snake Leaves,
told by Grimm.[187] As regards the Æsculapian fable, it seems that on one
occasion, while thinking what treatment to resort to in the case of a
patient of his, Glaucus, a serpent appeared and twined itself around his
staff; he killed it, whereupon another came bearing in its mouth an herb
with which it restored the dead one to life. The god used the same herb
with similar effect on the human subject.[188] The extremely miraculous
feature of this explanation is an obstacle in the way of its acceptance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account