“I am desired to inform you that you appear to ask no more than was
offered by the Court in their resolution of the 8th ultimo, in which
it was stated that, while the Court were restrained by legal doubts
as to the power of the University to grant degrees to women from
considering ‘the expediency of taking steps to obtain, in favour of
female students, an alteration of an ordinance which might be held not
to apply to women,’ they were ‘at the same time desirous to remove,
so far as possible, any present obstacle in the way of a complete
medical education being given to women; provided always that medical
instruction to women be imparted in strictly separate classes.’ On the
assumption, therefore, that while you at present decline the offer
made by the Court with reference to certificates of proficiency, you
now ask merely that arrangements should be made for completing the
medical education of yourself and the other ladies on behalf of whom
you write, I am to state that the Court are quite ready to meet your
views. If, therefore, the names of extra-academical teachers of the
required medical subjects be submitted by yourself, or by the Senatus,
the Court will be prepared to consider the respective fitness of the
persons so named to be authorised to hold medical classes for women
who have, in this or former sessions, been matriculated students
of the University, and also the conditions and regulations under
which such classes should be held. It is, however, to be distinctly
understood that such arrangements are not to be founded on as implying
any right in women to obtain medical degrees, or as conferring any
such right upon the students referred to.”
My friends, as I say, congratulated me on this apparently important
concession; but to make assurance doubly sure, I resolved to have
absolute official confirmation of the apparent meaning of the
Resolution, and therefore addressed another letter to the Court, in
which, after thanking them for their apparent good intentions, I
enquired whether I was correct in understanding--
“1. That, though you at present give us no pledge respecting our
ultimate graduation, it is your intention to consider the proposed
extra-mural courses as ‘qualifying’ for graduation, and that you will
take such measures as may be necessary to secure that they will be so
accepted, if it is subsequently determined that the University has the
power of granting degrees to women.
“2. That we shall be admitted in due course to the ordinary
Professional Examinations, on presentation of the proper certificates
of attendance on the said extra-mural classes.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account