"A surgeon who wishes to operate regularly ought first for a long time
to frequent places in which skilled surgeons often operate, and he
ought to pay careful attention to their operations and commit their
technique to memory. Then he ought to associate himself with them in
doing operations. A man cannot be a good surgeon unless he knows both
the art and science of medicine, and especially anatomy. The
characteristics of a good surgeon are that he should be moderately
bold, not given to disputations before those who do not know medicine,
operate with foresight and wisdom, not beginning dangerous operations
until he has provided himself with everything necessary for lessening
the danger. He should have well-shaped members, especially hands with
long slender fingers, mobile and not tremulous, and with all his
members strong and healthy, so that he may perform all the proper
operations without disturbance of mind. He must be highly moral,
should care for the poor for God's sake, see that he makes himself
well paid by the rich, should comfort his patients by pleasant
discourse, and should always accede to their requests if these do not
interfere with the cure of the disease." "It follows from this," he
says, "that the perfect surgeon is more than the perfect physician,
and that while he must know medicine he must in addition know his
handicraft."
The other great French surgeon of the fourteenth century was Guy de
Chauliac, who well deserves the name of father of modern surgery. He was
educated in a little town in the South of France, made his medical studies
at Montpellier, and then went on a journey of hundreds of miles to Italy
in order to make his postgraduate studies. While it is not generally
realized, for some seven centuries before the nineteenth Italy was the
home of graduate teaching in all departments. Whenever a man in any
country in Europe, from the beginning of the twelfth until the end of the
eighteenth century, wanted to secure opportunities for the higher
education that were not available in his home country, he went down into
Italy. At the beginning of the nineteenth century France usurped
Italy's place for half a century, and Germany pre-empted the position to a
great degree during the latter half of the nineteenth. The journey to
Italy in the Middle Ages was more difficult, and involved more expense and
time, than would even the voyage from America to Europe in our time; yet
many a student from France, Germany, and England made it for the sake of
the postgraduate opportunities, and it is matter for professional pride
that this was particularly true of our medieval colleagues in medicine and
surgery.
[Illustration: SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS OF GUY DE CHAULIAC, NOS. 1, 2, 3, AND
4 (FOURTEENTH CENTURY); AND SURGICAL APPARATUS OF HANS VON GERSSDORFF,
NOS. 5, 6 AND 7 (FIFTEENTH CENTURY)
_After plates in Gurlt's "Geschichte der Chirurgie"_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account