Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Literature, Medieval -- History and criticism; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Medieval
What is grammatica? The lore of interpreting poets and
story-writers and the theory of writing and speaking
correctly.[44]
St. Augustine refers to this induction into poetry as habitual.
Without some training in poetic you would not dare to attempt
the function of grammarian. Asper, Cornutus, Donatus, and
others without number are required, that any poet whose
verse appears to seek the applause of the theater may be
understood.[45]
For such teaching the favorite author was Vergil; the favorite authority,
the “Ars Poetica” of Horace.
From this period come also the standard medieval textbooks of logic.
The logic of Aristotle was mediated to the whole middle age by the
translations and commentaries of Boethius. “He translated the Εἰσαγωγή
of Porphyry and the whole of Aristotle’s _Organon_. He wrote a double
commentary on the Εἰσαγωγή and commentaries on the _Categories_ and the
_De interpretatione_ of Aristotle, and on the _Topica_ of Cicero. He
also composed original treatises on the categorical and hypothetical
syllogism, on Division and on Topical Differences.”[46] The medieval
order of studies was: Porphyry’s Introduction, the Categories,
Interpretation, Syllogisms, Topics.
b. RHETORICA
Quintilian was known to both Ausonius and Sidonius, and doubtless
generally to the rhetors of Gaul.[47] But his work is addressed rather
to teachers than to pupils. More available for the schools was Cicero’s
youthful compend _De inventione_. The early and continued use of this is
widely attested. Its contents are as follows:
_Book I._ i-vi scope, function, and relations of rhetoric;
vii its five parts; viii-xiii investigation (with _status_
and _quæstio_); xiv the parts of a speech; xv-xviii exordium;
xix-xxi statement of facts; xxii-xxiii division; xxiv-xli proof
(with adaptation to the persons and the case, and with the
kinds of argument); xlii-li rebuttal; lii-lv conclusion (with
appeal to feeling).
_Book II_ (expansion of I in pleading). i-iv introductory
review, the Aristotelian type and the Isocratean type, the
fields of oratory, the determining of the issue (_status_);
v-xvi issues of fact (_status coniecturalis_) in relation to
motive, person, evidence; xvii-xx issues of terms (_status
definitivus_); xxi-xxxvi issues involving more general
considerations (_status generalis_); xxxvii-xxxix profit
(_præmium_) in relation to advantages in themselves and to the
person concerned, in general and with reference to particular
opportunities; xl-li disputed written evidence; lii typical
subjects of deliberative oratory; liii-lvii honor, utility,
necessity; lix encomium and invective.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account