Memoirs of Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough, and of the Court of Queen Anne Vol. 2 (of 2)Thomson, A. T., Mrs.
History
Memoirs of Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough, and of the Court of Queen Anne Vol. 2 (of 2)
Thomson, A. T., Mrs.
Great Britain -- Court and courtiers -- Biography; Marlborough, Sarah Jennings Churchill, Duchess of, 1660-1744
The most ungracious act of Anne’s reign was her dismissal of the
disinterested, the faithful, loyal, and hard-working Godolphin. His
disagreement with the Duke of Somerset, called, in derision, by his
party, “the sovereign,” tended doubtless to split the forces which the
Whigs could ill spare. Somerset was a proud, interested, and equivocal
politician, whose personal views made him vacillate from side to
side.[173] From the correspondence between Mr. Maynwaring and the
Duchess of Marlborough at this time, it is evident that the Whigs
depended much on the Duke of Somerset’s movements to decide the balance
of power, notwithstanding the opinion entertained by the Duke of
Marlborough “that he was an ill-judging man.” It is also obvious that
the utmost persuasions were adopted, both by Maynwaring and by Mr.
Craggs, to induce the Duke and Duchess of Marlborough not prematurely,
nor unnecessarily, to throw up their employments; and there were even
many persons who recommended the Duchess to “live easy with Mrs.
Masham,” and who resented the Duchess’s indignant refusals to truckle,
as the Duke termed it, to her arch-enemy.
At last the final blow against the ministry was struck, by the dismissal
of Lord Godolphin. The probability of this event had been asserted ever
since the removal of Lord Sunderland, but had been positively denied by
Anne,—who, through her former secretary, Mr. Boyle, had sent assurances
to foreign courts that no more changes would be made in her ministry.
“And yet,” relates the Duchess,[174] “in less than two months after
this, and even the very day after the Queen had expressed her desire to
my Lord Godolphin himself that he would continue in her service, she
dismissed him; and her letter of order to him to break his staff was
sent by no worthier a messenger than a man in livery, to be left with
his lordship’s porter,—a proceeding which in all its parts would remain
very unaccountable, if the Queen had not, to those who expostulated with
her, made this undoubtedly true declaration, that she was sorry for it,
but could not help it. Unhappy necessity!”
The Duchess could not view these changes without making one more
struggle. It was probably at the united desire of the party that she
wrote a long, an able, and a characteristic letter to the Queen, of
which the precise date (for, like many ladies, she did not always date
her letters) is unknown. It was written, however, before the dismissal
of Lord Sunderland, whilst yet the ministry remained entire, and whilst
the “collection,” (as the Duchess termed those statesmen who were talked
of to succeed her friends) were in expectation only of the places and
honours which they attained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account