Derbyshire (England) -- Antiquities; Derbyshire (England) -- History
The circle is but an elaboration of a monolith surrounded by stones.
There is, however, every indication that it was introduced into this
country after it had passed through all its stages of evolution and
assumed its final form. Its builders made their way hither from the
south, spreading more especially over Spain, Brittany and Denmark on
the mainland, and on arriving upon our southern coasts, branching
northward through England and Scotland, even to the Orkneys, on the
one side, and by sea to Ireland and the Western Hebrides on the other.
Thus the date of its advent must have been subsequent to the mastery
of navigation. It has been assumed that because Stonehenge represents
the finished design, it must be the latest of our English examples,
and, therefore, the evolution of those rude, and often unhewn,
monuments of which so many examples have weathered more than two
thousand winters on the high-lands of the Peak. But the very opposite
proposition probably represents the truth. In the whole of our isles
there is no other example of a trilithic design, so the theory of local
evolution must fail. On the other hand, we trace it without a fault
from India, through Arabia, along the north coast of Africa, in Malta
and Minorca, and finally on the coast of Brittany, on its way to this
island. Again, the curious architectural joint of mortice and tenon,
which is so interesting a feature of Stonehenge, is unknown here, but
present in the trilithons of the Mediterranean shores.
[Illustration: Arbor Low: General View of the Southern Half.]
We may, therefore, infer that the builders of Stonehenge were of a
race which originally came from the south, and that the monument was
erected under the direction of men who had seen or had, at least, been
thoroughly instructed in the architecture of the earlier trilithons.
This was their work, but after them came the copyist and the invariable
deterioration. A parallel case is that of the introduction of the art
of coinage into this country about B.C. 200. It found its way to us
over nearly the same route, and in its earliest stages was, therefore,
an imitation of the Greek and Phœnician money then current; but
before many years had passed many of the designs had degenerated into
conventional figures, often of a distinctive character, yet evolved
by the exaggeration of some minor detail upon the prototype. Another
comparison may be made with the customs of burial about the period we
are considering. At first the useful and valuable flint implements
of the deceased were, with a praiseworthy unselfishness, interred or
cremated with his remains; but later, this sometimes became a mere
matter of ceremony, and it was thought sufficient to substitute flint
chippings for these offerings.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account