London (England) -- Antiquities; London (England) -- History
God grant mine eyes may
never behold the like, who now saw above 10,000 houses all in
one flame; the noise and cracking and thunder of the impetuous
flames, y^e shrieking of women and children, the hurry of
people, the fall of towers, houses and churches was like a
hideous storme and the aire all about so hot and inflam'd that
at the last one was not able to approach it, so that they were
forc'd to stand still and let y^e flames burn on, which they
did neere two miles in length and one in breadth. The clouds
also of smoke were dismall and reach'd upon computation neer
50 miles in length. Thus I left it this afternoone burning, a
resemblance of Sodom, or the last day. It forcibly call'd to
mind that passage--_non enim hic habemus stabilem civitatem_:
the ruines resembling the picture of Troy. London was, but is
no more."--(Sept. 3rd, 1666.)
Can we be surprised at the bewildered feelings of the people? Rather
must we admire the practical and heroic conduct of the homeless
multitude. It took long to rebuild the city, but directly anything
could be done the workers were up and doing.
An Act of Parliament was passed "for erecting a Judicature for
determination of differences touching Houses burned or demolished by
reason of the late Fire which happened in London" (18 and 19 Car. II.,
cap. 7), and Sir Matthew Hale was the moving spirit in the planning it
and in carrying out its provisions when it was passed. Burnet affirms
that it was through his judgment and foresight "that the whole city
was raised out of its ashes without any suits of law" (_History of
his Own Time_, Book ii.). By a subsequent Act (18 and 19 Car. II.,
cap. 8) the machinery for a satisfactory rebuilding of the city was
arranged. The rulings of the judges appointed by these Acts gave
general satisfaction, and after a time the city was rebuilt very much
on the old lines, and things went on as before.[10] At one time it was
supposed that the fire would cause a westward march of trade, but the
city asserted the old supremacy when it was rebuilt.
[Illustration: SOUTH-WEST VIEW OF OLD ST. PAUL'S.]
Three great men, thoroughly competent to give valuable advice on the
rebuilding of the city, viz., Wren, Robert Hooke, and Evelyn, presented
to the King valuable plans for the best mode of arranging the new
streets, but none of these schemes was accepted. One cannot but regret
that the proposals of the great architect were not carried out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account