Memories, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord FisherFisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
History
Memories, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord Fisher
Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
Admirals -- Great Britain -- Biography; Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron, 1841-1920; Great Britain. Royal Navy
If they find themselves in conflict with their expert advisers
_they should sack the advisers or themselves resign_. An official,
whether a Sea Lord or a junior clerk--having been asked a question
by his immediate chief and given his answer and the chief acts
contrary to advice--should not be subjected to reprimand for not
stating to the board of directors that he disagrees with his chief
or that he has given a reluctant consent. _If there is blame it
rests with the Minister and not with his subordinates._
“_I dissent in the strongest terms,” says Mr. Fisher in his
Minority Report, “from any suggestion that the Departmental
Adviser of a Minister in his company at a Council meeting should
express any views at all other than to the Minister and through him
unless specifically invited to do so._”
Sir Thomas Mackenzie expresses exactly the same view.
Mr. Asquith, in the House of Commons on November 2,
1915, said:--
“It is the duty of the Government--of any Government--to rely very
largely upon the advice of its military and naval counsellors; but
in the long run, a Government which is worthy of the name, which is
adequate in the discharge of the trust which the nation reposes in
it, must bring all these things into some kind of proportion one to
the other, and sometimes it is not only expedient, but necessary,
to run risks and to encounter dangers which pure naval or military
policy would warn you against.”
The Government and the War Council knew my opinion--as I told the
Dardanelles Commission, it was known to all. It was known even to the
charwomen at the Admiralty. It was my duty to acquiesce cheerfully and
do my best, but when the moment came that there was jeopardy to the
Nation I resigned.
Such is the stupidity of the General Public--and such was the stupidity
of Lord Cromer--that it was not realized there would be an end of
Parliamentary Government and of the People’s will, therefore, being
followed, if experts were able to override a Government Policy. Sea
Lords are the servants of the Government. Having given their advice,
then it’s their duty to carry out the commands of the political party
in power until the moment comes when they feel they can no longer
support a policy which they are convinced is disastrous.
Here follows a summary for the Chairman of the Dardanelles Commission
of my evidence (handed to Lord Cromer, but not circulated by him or
printed in the Report of the Commission):--
“Mr. Churchill and I worked in absolute accord at the Admiralty
until it came to the question of the Dardanelles.
“I was absolutely unable to give the Dardanelles proposal any
welcome, for there was the Nelsonic dictum that ‘any sailor who
attacked a fort was a fool.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account