Memories, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord FisherFisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
History
Memories, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord Fisher
Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
Admirals -- Great Britain -- Biography; Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron, 1841-1920; Great Britain. Royal Navy
Major-General Sir Chas. Caldwell, K.C.B., was Director of Military
Operations at the War Office during the whole period of the inception,
incubation and execution of the Dardanelles adventure, and in an
article in the “Nineteenth Century” for March, 1919, he completely
disposes of the criticisms of Mr. G. A. Schreiner in his book “From
Berlin to Bagdad,” and of those of Mr. H. Morgenthau, the late United
States Ambassador at Constantinople, in his recent book, “The Secrets
of the Bosphorus.” Both these works convey the impression that the
general attack by the Fleet upon the Defences of the Narrows on March
18th, 1915, very nearly succeeded. This verdict is not justified by the
facts as certified by Sir C. Caldwell. He proves incontestably that,
even in the very unlikely case of indirect bombardment really effecting
its object in putting the batteries out of action, there would still
be the movable armament of the Turks left to worry and defeat the
mine-sweepers, and there would still be the drifting mines and possibly
the torpedoes fired from the shore to imperil the battleships. When
peace did come it occupied the British Admiral a very long time to
sweep up the mines. The damaging effect of Naval Bombardment was
over-estimated--the extent to which the enemy’s movable armament would
interfere with mine-sweeping was not realised, and the extent and
efficiency of the minefields were unknown and unheeded. Sir Charles
Caldwell says:
“The whole thing was a mistake, quite apart from the disastrous
influence which the premature and unsuccessful operation exerted
over the subsequent land campaign.”
It is also most true what Sir C. Caldwell says that “the idea at
the back of the sailors’ minds (who so reluctantly assented to the
_political_ desire of getting possession of the Straits) was that
it was an experiment which could always be instantly stopped if the
undertaking were to be found too difficult.” But alas! “_the view
of the War Council came to be that they could not now abandon the
adventure._”
* * * * *
Marshal Liman von Sanders, who had charge of the defence of the
Dardanelles, said:
“The attack on the Straits by the Navy alone I don’t think could
ever have succeeded. I proposed to flood the Straits broadcast with
mines, and it was my view that these were the main defences of the
Dardanelles, and that the function of the guns of the forts was
simply to protect the minefields from interference.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account