It was at Eton that he began to feel his wings. His bringing up at home
had been scrupulously strict—his literary diet the veriest pap. His
precocious brain had been nourished upon food for babes. Not a novel
had he been allowed to open, not even Walter Scott’s. Shakespeare he
only knew through the medium of his precious brown Bowdler. Now he could
travel over all the wide range of the boys’ library, which was then
alongside of the entrance to the Provost’s Lodge in Weston’s Yard.
I can see him now, sitting perched up Turk-or-tailor-wise in one of the
windows looking out on the Yard, with some huge old-world tome almost
as big as himself on his lap, the afternoon sun setting on fire the
great mop of red hair. There it was that he emancipated himself, making
acquaintance with Shakespeare (minus Bowdler), Marlowe, Spenser, Ben
Jonson, Ford, Massinger, Beaumont and Fletcher, and the other poets and
playwrights of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. His tendency was
greatly towards the drama, especially the Tragic Drama. He had a great
sense of humour in others; he worshipped Dickens and would quote him
(especially Mrs. Gamp) unwearyingly; but his own genius leaned to Tragedy.
It is absurd to pretend, as was said in a letter to the _Times_, that as
a boy “he had an extraordinarily wide knowledge of the Greek poets, which
he read with ease in the original.” His study of the Greek tragedians,
upon whose work he so largely modelled his own, came much later in life.
At Eton these were lessons, and lessons are odious; besides no one can
assimilate Æschylus in homœopathic doses of thirty lines, and he knew no
more Greek than any intelligent boy of his age would do, nor did he take
any prominent part in the regular school work, though he was a Prince
Consort’s prizeman for modern languages. His first love in literature
was given to the English poets, and after or together with these he
devoured the great classics of France and Italy. The foundations of his
searching knowledge of the French and Italian languages were laid by his
accomplished mother. Of German he was ignorant, so Goethe, Schiller,
Herder, Wieland were sealed books to him. We may doubt whether they would
have appealed to him, for he was essentially a classicist; he might have
been better in touch with Schlegel and Novalis, as more nearly akin to
the romanticists whom he loved, among whom Victor Hugo was the object
of his special reverence; but that which I should call the Gothic in
literature might never have existed for aught that he cared.
How much he owed to his mother! Lady Jane was an attractive and most
distinguished woman. Her conversation was delightful, for her mind was a
rich storehouse of all that was good and beautiful, and her rare gift of
imparting what she knew was reflected in the bright light of the genius
of her son and pupil.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account