I was not prepared to answer him, or myself. In fact, to this day,
my own motives are a puzzle to which there is no single key, no easy
definition. One is not, after all, like those classic or neo-classic
figures who wore with such splendid mono-maniacal consistency the
scarlet of lust or the purple of dominion, or the bright yellow of
madness, existing not at all beneath their identifying robes. Power
appealed to me in my youth but only as a minor pleasure and not as
an end in itself or even as a means to any private or public end.
I enjoyed the idea of guiding and dominating others, preferably in
the mass; yet, at the same time, I did not like the boredom of power
achieved, or the silly publicness of a great life. But there was
something which, often against my will and judgment, precipitated me
into deeds and attitudes where the logic of the moment controlled me to
such an extent that I could not lessen, if I chose, the momentum of my
own wild passage, or chart its course.
I would not have confided this to Paul even had I in those days
thought any of it out, which I had not. Though I was conscious of some
fundamental ambivalence in myself, I always felt that should I pause
for a few moments and question myself, I could easily find answers
to these problems. But I did not pause. I never asked myself a single
question concerning motive. I acted like a man sleeping who was only
barely made conscious by certain odd incongruities that he dreams. The
secret which later I was to discover was still unrevealed to me as I
faced the efficient vulgarity of Paul Himmell across the portable bar
which reflected so brightly in its crystal his competence.
“My motives are perfectly simple,” I said, half-believing what I said.
In those days the more sweeping the statement the more apt I was to
give it my fickle allegiance: motives are simple, splendid! simple they
are. “I want something to do. I’m fascinated by Cave and I believe
what he says ... not that it is so supremely earthshaking. It’s been
advanced as a theory off and on for two thousand years. Kant wrote that
he anticipated with delight the luxurious sleep of the grave and the
Gnostics came close to saying the same thing when they promised a glad
liberation from life. The Eastern religions, about which I know very
little, maintain ...”
“That’s it!” Paul interrupted me eagerly. “That’s what we want. You
just keep on like that. We’ll call it 'An Introduction to John Cave.’
Make a small book out of it. Get it published in New York; then the
company will buy up copies and we’ll pass it out free.”
“I’m not so sure that I know enough formal philosophy to ...”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account