Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish AmericaJoyce, Thomas Athol
History
Mexican archæology : $b an introduction to the archæology of the Mexican and Mayan civilizations of pre-Spanish America
Joyce, Thomas Athol
Mayas -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities
days was in the hands of a professional priesthood and required much
study to perform correctly.
Since each “month” consisted of twenty days, and there were twenty
day-signs, it is obvious that each month in a given year began with the
same sign; but since the last month was followed by the five unlucky
days, it follows that each year began with a day-sign five days later
than the last. Also since 365 is divisible by 13 with 1 as remainder,
it follows equally that each year began with a day-number one in
advance of the last. Further, since there were twenty day-signs, and
five (the least common multiple of 365 and 20) goes into twenty exactly
four times, the year began with one of four signs only. Now the year
was always distinguished by the sign of the day on which it began, and
it is a peculiar fact that the commencement of the year never coincided
with the commencement of the tonalamatl. The four signs which give the
names to the years are the signs tecpatl, calli, tochtli and acatl,
recurring in that order. Whether the day-number entering into the name
of the year was that of the first day, as held by most authorities,
or of the first day of the fifth month, as Seler tries to prove, need
not be discussed here; the fact remains that the years were named
successively, 1. tecpatl, 2. calli, 3. tochtli, and so on, until, after
a period of fifty-two years (13 × 4), the same sign occurred again with
the same number as the name-date of the year. This period of fifty-two
years constituted the shorter cycle of the Mexicans, the longer cycle
consisting of twice that number; but before proceeding further it will
be necessary to say something about the months (see Appendix II).
The first month was called Atlcaualco, and the first day according
to Sahagun, who wrote about the middle of the sixteenth century,
corresponded with the 2nd of February. This month marked the cessation
of the rains,[3] and it was represented in calendars by a figure of
the god Tlaloc, to whom, together with Chalchiuhtlicue, the religious
festivals of the month were especially dedicated. Large numbers of
children were sacrificed to the rain-god, chiefly on mountains, but
also at a certain deep hole in the lagoon, and it was considered a good
omen if the small victims wept on their way to the place of sacrifice,
since their tears were supposed to portend a plentiful rain-supply. A
gladiatorial sacrifice was also made to Xipe during this month.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account