Mexican letters written during the progress of the late war between the United States and Mexico, no. 1.Brackenridge, H. M. (Henry Marie)
History
Mexican letters written during the progress of the late war between the United States and Mexico, no. 1.
Brackenridge, H. M. (Henry Marie)
Mexican War, 1846-1848; United States -- Politics and government -- 1845-1849
We find as early as the first term of Gen. Jackson, the most
ruinous complaints on the part of our fellow-citizens of the
wrongs inflicted on them by Mexico. They are such, says he, “as
cannot be tolerated by any government endued with a just
self-respect, with a proper regard for the opinions of other
nations, or with enlightened concern for the permanent welfare
of those portions of its people who may be interested in foreign
commerce.” After enumerating the various classes of outrages, he
adds, “citizens of the United States have been imprisoned for
long periods of time, without being informed of the offences
with which they were charged. Others have been murdered and
robbed on the high seas by Mexican officers, without any attempt
to bring the guilty to justice.” In a subsequent message to
Congress, he declares, “that such conduct _would justify
immediate war, in the eyes of all nations_.” The same language
was repeated by the subsequent administration, in still stronger
terms. All this was previous to the alleged wrongs on our part,
in respect to Texas, and the only excuse was the revolutionary
state, and the consequent disorders under which Mexico was then
a sufferer; and this plea, untenable as it is, was respected to
such a degree, as to amount to a denial of justice to our own
citizens. The American sufferings were aggravated by seeing the
prompt and decisive measures of the French to redress similar
outrages, when Admiral Baudin blew up the castle of San Juan de
Ulloa, and compelled the Mexican government to pay a million of
dollars on the deck of his vessel. How is it possible, after
these facts, to say, that our complaints against Mexico were
fictitious or exaggerated? Under the commission extorted from
her, without which, an open rupture must have followed, after
ascertaining three millions of just claims, an amount much
larger was left unadjusted, in consequence of the expiration of
the time limited for the duration of the commission, and even
that time shortened one half by the delays of the Mexican
commissioners. Instead of exacting payment at once, of the debt
thus ascertained and admitted to be due, we showed her every
indulgence, by consulting her convenience as to the time and
mode of payment. That debt still remains unpaid, and the
remaining claim unadjusted. Now, I would ask, whether, under the
circumstances, she was not bound to keep open diplomatic
relations for the purpose of providing payment for the amount
due, and for a proper adjudication of the remainder? She has
thought proper to take offence at the annexation of Texas, and
to put an end to diplomatic relations, and of course, of
peaceful negotiation on that, as well as on other subjects. The
act of recalling a minister, and sending passports to the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account