Monumentum Ancyranum: The Deeds of AugustusAugustus, Emperor of Rome
History
Monumentum Ancyranum: The Deeds of Augustus
Augustus, Emperor of Rome
Augustus, Emperor of Rome, 63 B.C.-14 A.D.; Rome -- History -- Augustus, 30 B.C.-14 A.D. -- Sources
A glance at the military establishment of Augustus may help to some
idea of its vast expense. Mommsen discusses the matter in detail (_R.
G._ pp. 68-76). Augustus seems to have left at his death a standing
army of twenty-five legions. Each legion approximated seven thousand
men, giving a total of 175,000 soldiers. His legions were numbered from
one to twenty-two. The number twenty-five is accounted for as follows:
the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth had been exterminated
under the leadership of Varus. But there were three legions, one in
Africa, one in Syria and one in Cyrenaica, bearing the title third,
and the fourth, fifth, sixth and tenth were each double. After Actium,
Augustus disbanded the legions numbered above twelve (cf. his colonies
of veterans at this time, numbering 120,000 men, c. XV). But by reason
of the repetitions above alluded to, the legions bearing the numbers
up to twelve, really amounted to eighteen. These duplications may have
risen from the absorption into Augustus' army of legions bearing the
same numbers from the forces of Lepidus and later from those of Antony.
In 759, eight new legions, the thirteenth to the twentieth, seem to
have been enrolled, in view of the German and Pannonian wars. This made
twenty six. Three were lost with Varus, and their numbers, seventeen,
eighteen and nineteen, seem never to have been restored to the list.
To offset this loss in a measure, two new legions, the twenty-first
and twenty-second were levied. Thus the twenty-five remaining at the
death of Augustus are accounted for. Such an establishment was
enormously and increasingly expensive. Pliny, _Hist. Nat._, VII,
45.
[83] This form of benefaction began in 736. It is a little remarkable
that Augustus should not mention the exact years of its continuance,
its amount, or the beneficiaries, while he does name the minimum number
of men who received aid from time to time. Perhaps he did not go into
details because these gifts concerned the provincials and would be of
slight interest to the city people for whose reading the inscription
was intended. In 742, “when Asia was in need of aid on account of
earthquakes, he paid the year’s tribute of the province out of his own
means.” Dio, LIV, 30.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account