Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and othersSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
Mystics of the Renaissance and their relation to modern thought, including Meister Eckhart, Tauler, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme, Giordano Bruno, and others
Steiner, Rudolf
Mysticism
We are beings like others, forming links in the chain of Nature’s
workings. But with knowledge we separate ourselves off from this
whole; we create within us a mental world, wherewith we stand alone and
isolated over against Nature. We have become enriched; but our riches
are a burden which we bear with difficulty; for it weighs primarily
upon ourselves alone. And we must now, by our own strength, find the
way back again to Nature. We have to recognise that we ourselves
must now fit our wealth into the stream of world activities, just as
previously Nature herself had fitted in our poverty. All evil demons
lie in wait for man at this point. His strength can easily fail
him. Instead of himself accomplishing this fitting in, he will, if
his strength thus fails, seek refuge in some revelation coming from
without, which frees him again from his loneliness, which leads back
once more to the knowledge that he feels a burden, into the very womb
of being, into the Godhead. Like Nicholas of Cusa, he will believe
that he is travelling his own road; and yet in reality he will be only
following the path which his own spiritual evolution has pointed out
for him.
Now there are--in the main--three roads which one can follow, when
once one has reached the point at which Nicholas had arrived: the one
is positive faith, forcing itself upon us from without; the second
is despair; one stands alone with one’s burden, and feels the whole
universe tottering with oneself; the third road is the development of
the deepest, most inward powers of man. Confidence, trust in the world
must be one of our guides upon this third path; courage, to follow that
confidence whithersoever it may lead us, must be the other.
AGRIPPA VON NETTESHEIM AND
THEOPHRASTUS PARACELSUS
Both Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim (1487-1535) and
Theophrastus Paracelsus (1493-1541) followed the same road along which
points Nicholas of Cusa’s way of conceiving things. They devoted
themselves to the study of Nature, and sought to discover her laws by
all the means in their power and as thoroughly as possible. In this
knowledge of Nature, they saw the true basis of all higher knowledge.
They strove to develop this higher knowledge from within the science or
knowledge of Nature by bringing that knowledge to a new birth in the
spirit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account