Natural history of intellect, and other papersEmerson, Ralph Waldo
Philosophy
Natural history of intellect, and other papers
Emerson, Ralph Waldo
American essays -- 19th century; Boston (Mass.); Intellect; Memory; Michelangelo Buonarroti, 1475-1564; Milton, John, 1608-1674
The planters of Massachusetts do not appear to have been hardy men,
rather, comfortable citizens, not at all accustomed to the rough task
of discoverers; and they exaggerated their troubles. Bears and wolves
were many; but early, they believed there were lions; Monadnoc was
burned over to kill them. John Smith was stung near to death by the
most poisonous tail of a fish, called a sting-ray. In the journey of
Rev. Peter Bulkeley and his company through the forest from Boston to
Concord they fainted from the powerful odor of the sweetfern in the
sun;—like what befell, still earlier, Biorn and Thorfinn, Northmen,
in their expedition to the same coast; who ate so many grapes from
the wild vines that they were reeling drunk. The lions have never
appeared since,—nor before. Their crops suffered from pigeons and
mice. Nature has never again indulged in these exasperations. It
seems to have been the last outrage ever committed by the sting-rays
or by the sweetfern, or by the fox-grapes; they have been of
peaceable behavior ever since.
Any geologist or engineer is accustomed to face more serious dangers
than any enumerated, excepting the hostile Indians. But the awe was
real and overpowering in the superstition with which every new object
was magnified. The superstition which hung over the new ocean had
not yet been scattered; the powers of the savage were not known; the
dangers of the wilderness were unexplored; and, in that time, terrors
of witchcraft, terrors of evil spirits, and a certain degree of
terror still clouded the idea of God in the mind of the purest.
The divine will descends into the barbarous mind in some strange
disguise; its pure truth not to be guessed from the rude vizard under
which it goes masquerading. The common eye cannot tell what the bird
will be, from the egg, nor the pure truth from the grotesque tenet
which sheathes it. But by some secret tie it holds the poor savage
to it, and he goes muttering his rude ritual or mythology, which yet
conceals some grand commandment; as courage, veracity, honesty, or
chastity and generosity.
So these English men, with the Middle Ages still obscuring their
reason, were filled with Christian thought. They had a culture of
their own. They read Milton, Thomas à Kempis, Bunyan and Flavel with
religious awe and delight, not for entertainment. They were precisely
the idealists of England; the most religious in a religious era. An
old lady who remembered these pious people said of them that “they
had to hold on hard to the huckleberry bushes to hinder themselves
from being translated.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account