Nature readers : $b Sea-side and way-side. No. 4Wright, Julia McNair
Science
Nature readers : $b Sea-side and way-side. No. 4
Wright, Julia McNair
Nature study -- Juvenile literature; Readers
“Do we not daily read footprints in sand in this fashion? As we came
here we crossed the road lying deep in summer dust. There in the dust
were the prints of a three-toed foot. We recognized the size and
shape; it was the track of a hen’s foot; a large fat hen we judged,
because the prints were large and deeply indented. Around her tracks
were the small delicate marks of the feet of young chicks. There were
many of them; evidently the hen had a large brood with her. Here she
had scratched in the dust where some grain or meal had been scattered:
here was a deep hollow where the dust was flirted about on all sides;
the hen had been taking a dust-bath. Here were some much larger marks
of three-toed feet, their distance apart showing a longer stride: we
felt quite certain that a big rooster had marched that way. We knew
about the hen, the chicks, the cock, the feeding, the wallowing, as
well as if we had watched the birds themselves and their performances.
But we had only seen footprints in the sand. Has any one of us wondered
at Robinson Crusoe’s conclusions when on the beach he found the print
of a naked human foot?”
The pupils admitted the justice of this reasoning. “What else have you
read?” they questioned.
“Shortly after the shower an animal passed this way; a two-legged
animal with three-toed feet, and a stride six feet in length. Such
a creature would make an ostrich seem small. Whether it was a bird
or a lizard I cannot tell, at all events it has neither kindred nor
descendants in the modern era. If a bird, it was of that antique type
which had teeth and no feathers and wore a lizard’s tail. It was
probably a wader of some kind, and ate mollusks and fish. I say that
it passed this way about the time of the shower, because I find its
footprints near the rain-marks, and on the same level of rock, and
because they seem to have been covered up about the same time, and in
the same manner.”
“Do you suppose if we broke up some of this rock we should find remains
of the living creatures that moved over it?”
“No; sandstone is not rich in fossils. Perhaps the oxide of iron
that frequently accompanies the sand has destroyed plant and animal
organisms, or it may be that when the heavy quartz grains dropped out
of the water, the plant and animal remains were carried off by tides
or currents. Still, in some parts of the world fossils are found in
sandstones.”
“Do all the strata of sandstone tell this same story?”
“Each varies the story somewhat to suit its own circumstances. Some
tell us which way the tides flowed and the rivers ran that brought them
to their resting places long ago.”
“Are all sandstones alike, except in color?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account