Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.Van Evrie, John H.
History
Negroes and Negro "Slavery:" the first an inferior race: the latter its normal condition.
Van Evrie, John H.
African Americans; Slavery -- Justification; Slavery -- United States
no physical tests to embarrass us or to compel the will to bow to that
fixed and immutable standard of truth which the Eternal has planted in
the very heart of things, and which otherwise the laws of the mental
organism absolutely force us to recognize. But the existence of distinct
species of men does not belong to this category. It is fact, a palpable,
immediate, demonstrable and unescapable fact. We know, and we cannot
avoid knowing, that the negro is a negro and is not a white man, and
therefore we cannot believe, however much we may strive to do so, that
he is the same being that we are, or in other words, that all mankind
constitute a single race or species. All that is possible or permissible
is to make liars and hypocrites of ourselves—to pretend to believe in a
thing that we do not and cannot believe in—to force this hypocrisy and
pretended belief on others who may happen to have confidence in our
honesty and respect for our ability; and finally, as a salve for our
outraged conscience, to deceive ourselves with the notion that our
motives are good, and the end justifies the means.
But the advocates of the European theory of a single race are faced by
other difficulties, which are quite as unavoidable as those thus briefly
glanced at. They demand that the world shall believe in the dogma of a
single race, but not one among them will act upon it in practice, or
convince others of their sincerity by living up to their avowed belief.
If the Negro had descended from the same parentage, or, except in color
merely, was the same being as ourselves, then there could be no reason
for refusing to amalgamate with him as with the several branches of our
race. But on the contrary, the reverend and distinguished gentleman who
has ventured to declare that the belief that the Negro is a being like
ourselves, is essential to Christianity, would infinitely prefer the
death of his daughter to that of marriage with the most accomplished and
most pious Negro in existence! If he believed in his own assertions in
regard to this matter, then it would be his first and most imperative
duty, as a Christian minister, to set an example to others, to labor
night and day to elevate this (in that case) wronged and outraged
race—indeed, to suffer every personal inconvenience, even martyrdom
itself, in the performance of a duty so obvious and necessary. And when
this theory was at last reduced to practice, and all the existing
distinctions and “prejudices” against the Negro were obliterated, and
the four millions of Negroes amalgamated with the whites, society would
be rewarded by the increased morality and purity that would follow an
act of such transcendent justice. But will any one believe in such a
result—that, reducing to practice the belief, or pretended belief of a
single race, will or would benefit American society? No, indeed; on the
contrary, every one _knows_—even the wildest and most perverted
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account