New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?Various
History
New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2: Who Began the War, and Why?
Various
World War, 1914-1918
I replied to the [British] Ambassador that I have begun
conversations with the Austro-Hungarian Ambassador, under
conditions which I hope may be favorable. I have not, however,
received as yet any reply to the proposal made by me for revising
the note between the two Cabinets.--(British "White Paper" No.
53.)
Here it is shown plainly how little the conference plan was after the
heart of the Russians. Had they accepted it it would have had to be done
immediately. As soon as the situation had grown very much more serious
by the failure of the negotiations with Austria-Hungary there would have
been no more time for this.[03]
A telegram of the English Ambassador in St. Petersburg, dated July 27,
(British "White Paper" No. 55,) shows how this conference was expected
to be conducted in St. Petersburg:
His Excellency [Sazonof] said he was perfectly ready to stand aside
if the powers accepted the proposal for a conference, but he
trusted that you would keep in touch with the Russian Ambassador in
the event of its taking place.--(British "White Paper" No. 55.)
Russian shrewdness evidently expected to control the conference by
keeping in touch with Grey, who of course would have been the Chairman.
The dispatches of his own Ambassadors lying before him should have
enabled the Secretary of State to see the perfidy of the Russian policy.
Buchanan wrote on the 28th from St. Petersburg:
... and asked him whether he would be satisfied with the assurance
which the Austrian Ambassador had, I understood, been instructed to
give in respect to Servia's integrity and independence.... In reply
his Excellency stated that if Servia were attacked Russia would not
be satisfied with any engagement which Austria might take on these
two points....--(British "White Paper" No. 72.)
Entirely in contrast herewith is one report of the British
representative in Vienna, dated Aug. 1, and speaking of a conversation
with the Russian Ambassador there:
Russia would, according to the Russian Ambassador, be satisfied
even now with assurance respecting Servian integrity and
independence. He said that Russia had no intention to attack
Austria.--(British "White Paper" No. 141.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account