Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophyNewton, Isaac
General
Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophy
Newton, Isaac
Celestial mechanics -- Early works to 1800; Mechanics -- Early works to 1800
"I was, on Sunday night, the 7th March, 1724-5, at Kensington, with
Sir Isaac Newton, in his lodgings, just after he was out of a fit of
the gout, which he had had in both of his feet, for the first time,
in the eighty-third year of his age. He was better after it, and his
head clearer and memory stronger than I had known them for some time.
He then repeated to me, by way of discourse, very distinctly, though
rather in answer to my queries, than in one continued narration, what
he had often hinted to me before, viz.: that it was his conjecture
(he would affirm nothing) that there was a sort of revolution in the
heavenly bodies; that the vapours and light, emitted by the sun, which
had their sediment, as water and other matter, had gathered themselves,
by degrees, into a body, and attracted more matter from the planets,
and at last made a secondary planet (viz.: one of those that go round
another planet), and then, by gathering to them, and[Pg 54] attracting more
matter, became a primary planet; and then, by increasing still, became
a comet, which, after certain revolutions, by coming nearer and nearer
to the sun, had all its volatile parts condensed, and became a matter
fit to recruit and replenish the sun (which must waste by the constant
heat and light it emitted), as a faggot would this fire if put into it
(we were sitting by a wood fire), and that that would probably be the
effect of the comet of 1680, sooner or later; for, by the observations
made upon it, it appeared, before it came near the sun, with a tail
only two or three degrees long; but, by the heat it contracted, in
going so near the sun, it seemed to have a tail of thirty or forty
degrees when it went from it; that he could not say when this comet
would drop into the sun; it might perhaps have five or six revolutions
more first, but whenever it did it would so much increase the heat of
the sun that this earth would be burned, and no animals in it could
live. That he took the three phenomena, seen by Hipparchus, Tycho
Brahe, and Kepler's disciples, to have been of this kind, for he could
not otherwise account for an extraordinary light, as those were,
appearing, all at once, among the fixed stars (all which he took to
be suns, enlightening other planets, as our sun does ours), as big as
Mercury or Venus seems to us, and gradually diminishing, for sixteen
months, and then sinking into nothing. He seemed to doubt whether
there were not intelligent beings, superior to us, who superintended
these revolutions of the heavenly bodies, by the direction of the
Supreme Being. He appeared also to be very clearly of opinion that the
inhabitants of this world were of short date, and alledged, as one
reason for that opinion, that all arts, as letters, ships, printing,
needle, &c., were discovered within the memory of history, which could
not have happened if the world had been eternal; and that there were
visible marks of ruin upon it which could not be effected by flood
only.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account